03:33 < minus> thanks ChillerDragon but i think i'll pass
03:36 < minus> unless you need anything infra/CI-wise
03:38 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> @minus i dont need any infra. Just decided to invite all ppl i trust not to delete repo (mostly current ddnet/teeworlds org owners). Just to idle there in case someone wants to change the gh settings and im not there.
03:39 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> ops forgot we are in irc i got so used to chatting with ppl on discord i put @ -.-
03:40 < bridge> <d_une> minus btw, you don't personally enjoy programming as much as the sysadmin stuff?
03:40 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> I just dont like it being a "me" project. You can idle in the owner seat or decline if you really want nothing to do with it.
03:40 < bridge> <d_une> ChillerDragon: can't you give write access rather than admin access?
03:40 < bridge> <d_une> eh I haven't heard of any decentralised development projects, is that a thing?
03:40 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> yes i gave write access to like 40 ppl and then owner access to the org to a hand full people so that its not just me there which just feels wrong.
03:41 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> @d_une me neither but i wanna try it out
03:41 < bridge> <d_une> I don't see how it'd work
03:41 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> it sounds crazy i know
03:41 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> democracy sucks
03:41 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> but hey lets try it
03:41 < bridge> <d_une> I wouldn't say that, just asking what's the plan
03:41 < bridge> <d_une> cause you need to solve disagreements etc.
03:42 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> my plan is this https://github.com/teeworlds-community/teeworlds/issues/71
03:42 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> but also my plan is that my plan does not matter too much and everyone can decide
03:43 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> @d_une yea i assume disagreements would be solved by majority. I wonder how stable the github feature is. Since you can cancle other peoples request for changes.
03:43 < bridge> <d_une> it's fine to try stuff no one has succeeded in, but gotta have a plan no?
03:43 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> yes i mentioned my plan or are you missing some details?
03:44 < bridge> <d_une> yes, what's a majority?
03:44 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> every pr that has 4 approvals by users with write access can be added to the merge queue
03:45 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> and those people have the power to change the value 4 to something else https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1708742697.png
03:49 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> I much rather would have oy come back and merge prs or let someone else merge prs. But for now this fork is the best idea I have. And I am planning to abandon it as soon as oy returns.
10:51 < bridge> <reitw> finally there's a discussion about doing smth
10:51 < bridge> <reitw> damn
11:34 < ws-client> <ChillerDragon> @reitw there is one every now and then but if oy doesn't show up nothing happens :c 
14:17 < bridge> <stiopa> it will take quite a bit to break the deadlock