04:00 <+bridge> @essigautomat please fix the hookline 04:00 <+bridge> its full ragebait 04:00 <+bridge> i you think you can hook 04:00 <+bridge> but then you miss 04:01 <+bridge> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1510825505044172880/BecauseMaybe_ASDDDDDDDDS.mp4?ex=6a1e3966&is=6a1ce7e6&hm=d7b9673fe32eb07f6c5f90832115954369b17d200c7cc1cca6f73a449435a0fa& 04:02 <+bridge> you think you can hook 19:45 <+bridge> told u guys its gonna be ai slop 19:46 <+bridge> fusion of ai and rtx :kek: 19:55 <+bridge> tbh, I haven't been observing anything explosive lately, most of the recent improvements are due to better feedback loops and integration 19:56 <+bridge> but I'm not a AI™ poweruser™, so it can always just be me holding it wrong 19:58 <+bridge> ``` 19:58 <+bridge> In [9]: simgr.errored[0] 19:58 <+bridge> Out[9]: 19:58 <+bridge> 19:58 <+bridge> In [10]: simgr.errored[0].error 19:58 <+bridge> Out[10]: angr.errors.SimSolverModeError('Claripy threw an error') 19:58 <+bridge> ``` 19:58 <+bridge> 19:59 <+bridge> honestly thats the part that sucks. bad devs are not magically better and think they can do anything now. 19:59 <+bridge> 19:59 <+bridge> just good devs have to do less boilerplate to do now 20:01 <+bridge> ye 20:04 <+bridge> I must agree that this revolution has unleashed a lot of morons into the field 20:09 <+bridge> I don't know how much time it will take of forcing myself to use it for it to ever feel justified 20:10 <+bridge> using such an intrinsically inefficient technology goes against everything I aim to do in the field 20:10 <+bridge> it's not like I want to be a luddite about it 20:11 <+bridge> deepseek is apparently still 75% off for the time being when before it was only supposed to be for May 20:11 <+bridge> that's something 20:11 <+bridge> if you're gonna fork over money at least don't give it to the americans 20:12 <+bridge> I've been forcing myself to use more of it so I can be hireable 🙃 20:37 <+bridge> the image was a reference to some of the ddnet prs and i think it makes heinrichs view more understandable 20:38 <+bridge> how did it go 20:39 <+bridge> how is it inefficient 20:39 <+bridge> i guess he means energy wise 20:40 <+bridge> no luck 20:41 <+bridge> wat 20:42 <+bridge> i mean the story 20:44 <+bridge> i dont remember it exactly 20:44 <+bridge> srsly 20:45 <+bridge> i stopped caring about the world 20:45 <+bridge> it's not efficient in any metric 20:45 <+bridge> u cant control it 20:45 <+bridge> ppl who do dont have morals 20:45 <+bridge> why should i 20:45 <+bridge> its death anyway 20:45 <+bridge> it can be fast if you throw enough power at it but don't confuse that with efficiency just because it saves you time 20:46 <+bridge> contrary to popular belief your time is not more valuable than our planet's finite resources and tolerances 20:46 <+bridge> there are the ppl getting the shit end of the stick due to AI and there are those who love it and stay ignorant to the aforementioned effects 20:47 <+bridge> anyone caught in the middle has been polarized because you can't wait around to see if you can use it and continue to make a living 20:47 <+bridge> this is about most stuff in consumerism 20:47 <+bridge> ye 20:47 <+bridge> cars gas, food, all sucks 20:47 <+bridge> i wont get stressed over it 20:48 <+bridge> not when u make the kind of money you do 20:48 <+bridge> i got other things to fuss about as a non rich person 20:48 <+bridge> oh idk what money u think ii do xD 20:48 <+bridge> im in debt 20:48 <+bridge> like most ppl 20:48 <+bridge> still no debt for me but I'm finally not bleeding money anymore 20:48 <+bridge> my savings are growing again if very slowly and because of the kindness of my family to house and feed me free of charge 20:49 <+bridge> ye thats nice 20:49 <+bridge> I would not be making it on my own rn 20:49 <+bridge> igot it the other way around 20:49 <+bridge> i cant return to them 20:49 <+bridge> if i fail im done 20:49 <+bridge> i think thats worse 20:49 <+bridge> ye I understand that 20:50 <+bridge> you have a fire under your ass that I never have 20:50 <+bridge> and i nearly got fired cuz AI 20:50 <+bridge> I never would've lost my job if I had said fire 20:50 <+bridge> they laid off like 40% 20:50 <+bridge> damn 20:50 <+bridge> ii think stress is making me go bald faster 20:50 <+bridge> xd 20:50 <+bridge> definitely 20:50 <+bridge> get your vitamin d 20:50 <+bridge> i thought u left ddnet btw 20:51 <+bridge> came back to get a rank removed via admin mail and am getting distracted by developer chat again xd 20:51 <+bridge> I have nothing else to do in this time tho 20:51 <+bridge> I'm in the passenger's seat of the junk truck 20:52 <+bridge> so much fucking driving in the Denver metro area to get anywhere 20:54 <+bridge> it wastes energy when ppl generate pure slop for no reason, but i could also say the internet wastes energy when we could instead be walking to libraries for information instead 20:54 <+bridge> the extent to which the energy is wasted is a difference of large magnitude 20:55 <+bridge> lol what, it takes a lot more effort to find information in a library than the internet 20:55 <+bridge> you can draw the comparison in principle but it's just copium 20:55 <+bridge> when u think about the actual cost 20:56 <+bridge> the only things other that ever came close to requiring that much brute force parallelization and power usage are intrinsically inefficient 20:56 <+bridge> gaming for pleasure and proof of work for crypto 20:57 <+bridge> going to a library is more environmentally sustainable than using the internet 20:57 <+bridge> that's very arguable 20:58 <+bridge> if u walk there it is 20:58 <+bridge> i thought we are taling about wasting time and energy of the developer 20:58 <+bridge> I wasn't but it's worth mentioning 20:58 <+bridge> i thought we are talking about wasting time and energy of the developer 20:59 <+bridge> you can have carbon neutral internet routing systems much more easily than e.g. AI 20:59 <+bridge> the finite precious resources are a different topic but fundamentally we make too much, use too much at a time, and throw too much away 21:12 <+bridge> Idk enough about this to discuss much further but i guess i just think that the advancement of useful technology is usually good for everyone but at the same time i do think itsvery much inefficient 21:12 <+bridge> theres a lot of good use cases and at the same time u have companies pushing out absolute slop to consumers who dont need to use ai at all 21:12 <+bridge> for whatever reason 21:12 <+bridge> yeah it's just that real world benefits have yet to be seen whereas the downsides are overabundant and have undone any attempts at environmental neutrality almost instantly 21:12 <+bridge> it's our nail in the coffin 21:13 <+bridge> it's not the sole killer but we can never actually become sustainable if we rely on this junk 21:14 <+bridge> I cannot name a single thing that has actually improved in the wake of AI 21:14 <+bridge> developers can grind out subpar products faster. great 21:14 <+bridge> good for your day-to-day. that's it 21:15 <+bridge> good for the day-to-day of a shrinking minority, that's essentially it 21:26 <+bridge> https://github.com/stanford-cs336/assignment1-basics/blob/main/CLAUDE.md 22:37 <+bridge> walking is similar to driving a normal car if you account for needing to eat food 22:39 <+bridge> electric bike is the best iirc 22:42 <+bridge> is the fast practice button from best client controversial? I really like the idea and how it is implemented. if people find it cheating I wont use it 22:54 <+bridge> it would be a good townhall post 23:01 <+bridge> I personally would've implemented it myself if I wasn't lazy as hell xd 23:02 <+bridge> ...and then I would've made a town hall post to ask if it's okay