00:09 <+bridge> yeah but can u some how integrate the api or smth to the map? 00:16 <+bridge> guess i become an IRC bot in march 00:18 <+bridge> It was age restricted for a reason, but I don't remember why 00:19 <+bridge> Probably because people were streaming CP 00:54 <+bridge> whats wrong with streaming checkpoints 01:07 <+bridge> @s3vage: what does „integrate the api to the map“ mean? 01:07 <+bridge> im not sure i asked one of the admins of the map and he said he will ask u to do that 01:08 <+bridge> To do what 01:08 <+bridge> i dont exactly remember but he mentioned smth about integrating the api with their server 01:09 <+bridge> Who’s server? 01:09 <+bridge> blockworlds 01:09 <+bridge> Oh 01:09 <+bridge> They already track stats them self don’t they 01:10 <+bridge> yeah but theres old stats thats saved on ur bot 01:10 <+bridge> You want to convert your ddnet Multeasymap stats to blockworlds? 01:10 <+bridge> basically yueah 01:10 <+bridge> basically yeah 01:10 <+bridge> Hmm 01:10 <+bridge> I finally understood what you want I think 01:10 <+bridge> But hmmm xd 01:11 <+bridge> im kinda restarted sry xd 01:11 <+bridge> I am not really associated with them 01:11 <+bridge> i told sakido first (one of the admins) and he said he would have to ask u 01:12 <+bridge> Tell him it’s fine by me xxl 01:12 <+bridge> Tell him it’s fine by me Xd 01:12 <+bridge> Just show him your !rank and ask him to copy the stats idk 01:12 <+bridge> If that dude wrote me on discord dms it’s gg he probably has no way to actually reach me 02:17 <+bridge> Well what does making the voice chat age restricted change? 02:17 <+bridge> that is still illegal 02:19 <+bridge> :kek: 02:21 <+bridge> replace voice chat with alcohol, then you can probably figure it out 02:22 <+bridge> nothing..? 02:22 <+bridge> so can we make the voice chats accessible to the public again? 02:22 <+bridge> so can we make the voice chats accessible to everyone again? 02:23 <+bridge> https://tenor.com/view/cretoi-icssmoke-gif-18150152580473674997 02:23 <+bridge> what 02:23 <+bridge> making alcohol age restricted doesnt change much since minors still drink 02:24 <+bridge> i didnt mean to u 02:25 <+bridge> oh i forgot to ping 02:25 <+bridge> @murpi 02:27 <+bridge> am i missing something.. 02:27 <+bridge> i mean u dont even have to make all the voice chats unrestricted 02:27 <+bridge> 1 is enough 02:46 <+bridge> we do not want people in our vcs who are incapable of following basic human ethics 02:46 <+bridge> 02:46 <+bridge> We can't monitor them 24/7, so we lock them behind an age restriction. 02:46 <+bridge> 02:46 <+bridge> it happened. Multiple times. I don't think you'll convince anyone to unlock em 02:48 <+bridge> okay but before there was id verification literally anyone could join aslong as they set their birthday to above 18 no? so what did it change 02:48 <+bridge> maybe you could remove screenshare permissions ? 02:48 <+bridge> i guess now its harder since you need to have an account that is verified 02:49 <+bridge> it would be better if there was no way to enable video and screenshare but idk is that a thing 02:49 <+bridge> there is a way 02:49 <+bridge> to disable screenshare 02:49 <+bridge> to disable screenshare permisisons 02:49 <+bridge> to disable screenshare/camera permisisons 02:50 <+bridge> i guess voice is still gonna need moderating a lot, so idk 02:50 <+bridge> depends on what happened before (idk) 02:51 <+bridge> i mean without screenshare permissions the worst u can do is say slurs i guess 02:51 <+bridge> which is alot better than CP 02:51 <+bridge> pretty sure you can also catfish and groom people with voice... which is my assumption about something that happened 02:51 <+bridge> yea i guess 02:51 <+bridge> same can be done with chat aswell 02:51 <+bridge> we had everything you can think of and probably worse 02:52 <+bridge> but its more moderated 02:52 <+bridge> Oh yeah, we had a voice chat (chat) incident as well 02:52 <+bridge> was fun handling that. 02:52 <+bridge> but what about this melon? 02:52 <+bridge> like before id verification did age restriction really do anything? 02:53 <+bridge> because couldnt you just set ur birthday to be above 18 and you can join 02:53 <+bridge> Idk when we introduced it, but it was like ~ 1 year ago I think 02:53 <+bridge> because couldnt you just set ur birthday to be above 18 and you can interact with age restricted things 02:54 <+bridge> it's the same principle as p*rn sites - it's a bad filter, but a filter nonetheless 02:54 <+bridge> yea i guess 02:55 <+bridge> but i feel like this filter is doing more harm than good 02:55 <+bridge> just use voice chats on another platform or server lowkey 02:55 <+bridge> considering that discord has been breached multiple times with thousands of ids being leaked 02:55 <+bridge> and other platforms have had the same 02:55 <+bridge> I went crash out about vc on this discord in moderator a year ago - I wanted them gone entirely 02:56 <+bridge> I went crashout about vc on this discord in moderator a year ago - I wanted them gone entirely 02:56 <+bridge> yea but like every discord server has a vc 02:56 <+bridge> this is the only server i have ever seen with age restricted voice channels only 02:57 <+bridge> really? I'm in multiple with age restriction 02:57 <+bridge> Guess I'm not the target audience where servers let kids run free :p 02:57 <+bridge> maybe im not in enough "big" servers 02:57 <+bridge> i dont really talk in many servers 02:57 <+bridge> mostly groupchats/small servers 02:59 <+bridge> ive seen other servers lock voice chats to people that are a high level in the server 02:59 <+bridge> (people that talk alot) 02:59 <+bridge> maybe that could be a better filter? 02:59 <+bridge> or people that have been in the server for a while 03:00 <+bridge> i guess its not of a big issue right now since id verification is only in some countrys but i heard they are doing global roll out in march 04:34 <+bridge> is it a big deal anyway? these VCs are hardly used 04:34 <+bridge> i was only in it today cus i randomly decided to see what was going on xd 04:34 <+bridge> in any case I f3 a voice-only one 05:59 <+bridge> no but every once in a while its used and i would like to join but i cant 10:18 <+bridge> Oh Shit they found the bug 10:18 <+bridge> Yea I’m not touching that mess of a find tile code again any time soon :/ 11:17 <+bridge> sounds like you knew this bug existed 11:44 <+bridge> :hmm: 14:04 <+bridge> I'm almost certain I got this fixed now 17:35 <+bridge> @learath2 https://rsaksida.com/blog/ape-coding/ 17:36 <+bridge> xD 18:05 <+bridge> Oh yes I knew 18:06 <+bridge> I even sent prep prs to fix it 18:06 <+bridge> Jupstar githubbing hype 18:07 <+bridge> Bro what is this L webgl shiet? Doesn’t it work in iOS lockdown mode or why does it throw this error for me :/ Failed to initialise webgl 18:08 <+bridge> I wanted to see new furry map https://ddnet.org/mappreview/?map=Cansada 19:01 <+bridge> tf is this xd 19:01 <+bridge> https://tenor.com/view/dragon-ball-dragon-ball-super-goku-goku-ultra-instinct-ui-gif-10017138207648182009 19:14 <+bridge> @qetoast: if you fork ddnet and try to pr against your fork GitHub ui will by default try to send the pr directly to ddnet. So this can easily happen by accident :/ 19:45 <+bridge> 🔥 19:56 <+bridge> ddnet vibe client xD 21:52 <+bridge> When are pull requests typically merged? Is there usually a defined review/merge schedule, or does it mainly depend on when maintainers have time and consider the PR ready? 21:57 <+bridge> If your pr is not merged within the first 48 hours it is likely dead 21:58 <+bridge> Dead means closed by you or a maintainer after a few months or still open in a few years 21:58 <+bridge> If your pr is good and ppl are busy you might get it in within a few weeks 22:00 <+bridge> Every 7 moons Heinrich goes through the full list progressing like 3 prs and only writing some status comments und the others. Robsi is consistently doing good reviews multiple times a week. Assa is there too. All other maintainers are full afk 22:00 <+bridge> Every 7 full moons Heinrich goes through the full list progressing like 3 prs and only writing some status comments und the others. Robsi is consistently doing good reviews multiple times a week. Assa is there too. All other maintainers are full afk 22:01 <+bridge> Every 7 full moons Heinrich goes through the full list progressing like 3 prs and only writing some status comments on the others. Robsi is consistently doing good reviews multiple times a week. Assa is there too. All other maintainers are full afk 23:12 <+bridge> hi im full afk 23:13 <+bridge> damn a 500k line pr 23:14 <+bridge> Do layers and groups in the editor start at 0 or 1? - can't check atm 23:14 <+bridge> Do groups in the editor start at 0 or 1? - can't check atm 23:15 <+bridge> Are you even in the org still? 23:29 <+bridge> ig 23:29 <+bridge> but on the web team lol 23:29 <+bridge> cuz i didnt leave that one 23:53 <+bridge> i can't access the thread about snaptap over matrix but um, consider that steno keyboards also do nontraditional stuff 23:53 <+bridge> idk who would be crazy enough to use a steno keyboard for ddnet or why u would want that but yeah 23:54 <+bridge> but yeah idk, its not always clear to people what is "automated" or not, really a lot of behavior of a keyboard is intentionally automatic 23:55 <+bridge> like when is the actuation point, when is reset point, etc, and these things can and should be out of mind, same goes for snaptap. so u can't just say "whatever the keyboard does, if its automatic, thats bad" 23:56 <+bridge> i imagine in a few years ppl won't even know why people care about snaptap or thought it was always part of mechanical keyboards (like now, we don't even think about slapping a typewriter back to the left etc. xd bad example but ye, sorta neo-luddite position against otherwise ignorant ppl 23:57 <+bridge> or to the right. how do typewriters work 23:59 <+bridge> i personally don't think you can compare stuff like anti-ghosting with snap tap 23:59 <+bridge> 23:59 <+bridge> Every gameplay-relevant state change must correspond to a physical action by the player, anti-ghosting makes sure the physical action happens, snap tap fakes it by virtually releasing the key for you 23:59 <+bridge> 23:59 <+bridge> We can't moderate it, but I don't think we should allow it 23:59 <+bridge> Maybe we could tolerate it's existence, but saying it's fine to use would extend our rules page by 200 lines 23:59 <+bridge> I'm still not arguing it shouldn't be moderated or something like this 23:59 <+bridge> I'm saying it should be properly excluded