00:21 <+bridge_> What features do you offer? 00:37 <+bridge_> 40 как минимум 00:37 <+bridge_> 40 at least 00:37 <+bridge_> What, not how many 😄 00:40 <+bridge_> We try to keep things under wraps until release, but all I can say now is: 00:40 <+bridge_> fully redesigned GUI 00:40 <+bridge_> 60+ new visual and support features for Kog and Race 00:40 <+bridge_> clan system and more 00:40 <+bridge_> voice chat 00:42 <+bridge_> There are still many interesting and unique features planned. 00:46 <+bridge_> @avolicious 00:47 <+bridge_> Is it a closed source client? 00:48 <+bridge_> What are visual support features? Is it something considered towards cheating? 00:57 <+bridge_> why is it a closed source 01:06 <+bridge_> The source will be closed to ordinary people, but it will be accessible to the administration (you). 01:27 <+bridge_> new client? 01:54 <+bridge_> hello, i have a problem with the vpn, i din´t active the vpn, but can´t connet to ddnet servers. 01:55 <+bridge_> Maybe you use zaprot? 01:55 <+bridge_> Maybe you use zapret? 01:59 <+bridge_> @sheux 02:06 <+bridge_> Before the release, we will contact the kog and ddrace administration to obtain a verified status. If any functions are considered cheating, we will remove them. 02:59 <+bridge_> WHY 03:06 <+bridge_> we don't want to let the pastors graze 03:08 <+bridge_> "we don't want to let the pastors graze":huh: 03:09 <+bridge_> auto translator 03:09 <+bridge_> I meant We don’t want to let pasters paste 03:17 <+bridge_> ??? is it a cheat clien 03:17 <+bridge_> ??? is it a cheat client 03:17 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466618370123108566/image.png?ex=697d664b&is=697c14cb&hm=b13e8e13fa5cf5db9bcc5757b1795f438a408f63ea4ef78cf1a222c3016f81a5& 03:18 <+bridge_> so why do u care if someone pastes ur feature 03:18 <+bridge_> supposed to be community game 03:18 <+bridge_> Even here they write about cheats 03:18 <+bridge_> yea because if it was a cheat i understand not allowing people paste 03:20 <+bridge_> Our argument is that we spend a HUGE amount of time implementing features, and we don’t want them to end up in other clients, we’re kind of justifying the name 03:20 <+bridge_> Our argument is that we spend a HUGE amount of time implementing features, and we don’t want them to end up in other clients, we want to justify the client name. 03:21 <+bridge_> use a license then? 03:22 <+bridge_> It’s simpler to just not release the source. I don’t see a problem with giving it to you as the administration, but when it comes to regular users, we’re not sure 03:22 <+bridge_> It’s easier to just keep the source private. I don’t mind sharing it with you as admins, but we’re unsure about giving it to regular people. 03:47 <+bridge_> well ur going to use git anyways so just make it a public repo 04:04 <+bridge_> why? if it isn't a cheat client you should open source it 04:05 <+bridge_> being afraid of other people using client features is an admission of wanting control and power over your users 04:05 <+bridge_> not a great look imo 04:06 <+bridge_> if you have an antibot module or otherwise sensitive code then it makes sense 04:08 <+bridge_> this is bad because then you have to keep pestering us to audit changes for every release. we can't just trust a source-available client and expect future versions to automatically be okay 04:09 <+bridge_> so it's just easier if anyone can audit it 05:57 <+bridge_> Im good for finding bugs 😎 call me babe 🤙 08:00 <+bridge_> lol 08:00 <+bridge_> closed-source client 08:01 <+bridge_> dont get me wrong ppl can have reasons for closed-source 08:02 <+bridge_> but when ur reason is "i worked so hawd and i dont want ppl to steal" its kinda soy 08:02 <+bridge_> maybe my opinion sux tho 08:03 <+bridge_> I never mind if something is closed-source. 08:04 <+bridge_> But I hate something that was under FOSS license at first, but the owner switched the license to a custom license later. 08:05 <+bridge_> e.g. LGPL -> Polyform Shield License 08:07 <+bridge_> In other words, it was converted from open-source to source-available 08:07 <+bridge_> :frozen: 09:21 <+bridge_> Why is meeting planning so hard ;_; We meet every 2 weeks, except if we doesn't, and today 1 hour earlier, and in 6 weeks 1 hour later, and we sacrifice the goats on full moon 10:12 <+bridge_> why does putting my margin to 10 set my ping to 28 and when i have 20 margin my ping is 18 10:13 <+bridge_> i know only prediction time matters but why does it do that 10:25 <+bridge_> isnt this impossible? unless they had contributors sign a CLA which said they could do this? 10:26 <+bridge_> helo tater , do u know about dnsbl 10:26 <+bridge_> uh 10:26 <+bridge_> i accept it as a yes 10:28 <+bridge_> so do i write sv_dnsbl_host "dns.proxycheck.io" and write my api key to sv_dnsbl_key or write both into sv_dnsbl_host "(api key).dns.proxycheck.io" 10:30 <+bridge_> I've never used dnsbl someone else might answer your question 10:30 <+bridge_> oke 10:31 <+bridge_> sv_dnsbl_key Optional Authentication Key for the specified DNSBL provider 10:31 <+bridge_> sv_dnsbl_host Hostname of DNSBL provider to use for IP Verification 10:31 <+bridge_> proably first one 10:31 <+bridge_> if it doesnt work then do other way i guess 10:35 <+bridge_> well i tried all of them and still doesnt work , i guess problem is my dnsbl provider , is there any provider for dnsbl 10:35 <+bridge_> what ddnet use for dnsbl 10:36 <+bridge_> pretty sure it should be private so its not easier to bypass 10:52 <+bridge_> So they did. 12:06 <+bridge_> @totar: when respond to ancient GitHub DMs 12:07 <+bridge_> I don't get notif unless you ping me 12:17 <+bridge_> \#12 12:17 <+bridge_> @totar: ^ 12:46 <+bridge_> that doesn't work unless they had "LGPL + we own all the work" before 12:47 <+bridge_> so it wasn't LGPL before 12:47 <+bridge_> it was LGPL plus some special exceptions for themselves 12:47 <+bridge_> use (L/A)GPL, and this won't happen 12:47 <+bridge_> But what I said has happened in the Minecraft mod community 😄 12:48 <+bridge_> Then just sue Microsoft (which also happened in Minecraft) 12:49 <+bridge_> Lol 12:49 <+bridge_> https://github.com/CaffeineMC/sodium/issues/2400 12:50 <+bridge_> are you not free to change a project's license to anything you want provided you're the only author? 12:50 <+bridge_> or get permission from all other contributors, which seems to have happened here 12:50 <+bridge_> yes, but I'm assuming there were contributors 12:51 <+bridge_> ah 12:53 <+bridge_> Just get permission from all ddnet contributors :greenthing: 12:53 <+bridge_> lol 12:55 <+bridge_> How could we contact with someone who has deleted all of their accounts on the Internet? 12:55 <+bridge_> And get their permissions 12:55 <+bridge_> :3 12:56 <+bridge_> Ask them in person, let them sign a letter 12:56 <+bridge_> idk what you'd do if this person died 12:57 <+bridge_> But how could you know who they are offline. 12:57 <+bridge_> :thonk: 12:57 <+bridge_> wait 70 years :kek: 12:57 <+bridge_> You could just risk it, if they want to sue they'd have to proof it 12:59 <+bridge_> And you can claim the person was uncontactable 12:59 <+bridge_> we all pretend that licenses are enforced 13:00 <+bridge_> if you have no children or relative and write no will then a magic legal entity called your "estate" owns the copyright for the next 70 years 13:00 <+bridge_> if you have no children or relatives and write no will then a magic legal entity called your "estate" owns the copyright for the next 70 years 13:00 <+bridge_> in the US at least 13:01 <+bridge_> unless they write in their will that it becomes public domain then you can't use it for 70 years 13:01 <+bridge_> in germany I think the goverment would then own it :kek: 13:01 <+bridge_> yeah that's how it works 13:02 <+bridge_> btw you can also apply mixxed licenses ... 13:02 <+bridge_> like make all new code run under a new license 13:03 <+bridge_> ppl could still fork the old code 13:03 <+bridge_> The copyright will be retained for 50 years after the owner's death 13:03 <+bridge_> (In China) 13:03 <+bridge_> I wonder when the first GPL licenced code will become public domain 13:03 <+bridge_> eventually linux kernel will be public domain 13:03 <+bridge_> not in our lifetimes 13:04 <+bridge_> Yeah 13:05 <+bridge_> huh 13:05 <+bridge_> wait a minute 13:06 <+bridge_> I think linux kernel won't be public domain. 13:11 <+bridge_> first release was 1991, so the first linux kernel will be in public domain in 2061, according to US law 13:15 <+bridge_> wouldnt it be time of death of Linus + 70 years? 13:16 <+bridge_> wouldnt it be date of death of Linus + 70 years? 13:36 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466774032035872838/aL6twDw.png?ex=697df744&is=697ca5c4&hm=f97bd3f64bd619682a971672e38324b87f31379411fd1ad76b457872c7e6dc68& 13:38 <+bridge_> yea probably 14:08 <+bridge_> Well, if most of you are for open source, we are generally ready to go along with it. I'll discuss this with the other developers later. 14:09 <+bridge_> Well, I generally understand your position. 14:09 <+bridge_> Let’s kill Linus! 14:10 <+bridge_> torvalds? 14:10 <+bridge_> Wait can I say that on discord? 14:10 <+bridge_> Yes 14:10 <+bridge_> To improve openness 14:10 <+bridge_> I am freedomfighter 14:11 <+bridge_> But for example, there is a cat client, and as its developer told me, only the administration has the source code, just like we wanted 14:12 <+bridge_> But for example, there is a koshka client, and as its developer told me, only the administration has the source code, just like we wanted 14:12 <+bridge_> No I did not mean your client. 😄 14:12 <+bridge_> . 14:15 <+bridge_> in minecraft, right? 14:15 <+bridge_> By the way, why do Chillerdragon and Gorp write through bots? 14:15 <+bridge_> :huh: 14:16 <+bridge_> https://xkcd.com/1782/ 14:34 <+bridge_> I saw a player with koshka client on my server op 14:34 <+bridge_> I saw a player with koshka client on my server oO 14:34 <+bridge_> Cute furry client ngl 14:34 <+bridge_> https://youtube.com/shorts/3lh50QD7su0 14:34 <+bridge_> Like 8 years ago I wanted to do a weekly Teeworlds news series and at the end I wanted to do a client recommendation of the week 14:34 <+bridge_> Back then that made no sense at all 14:34 <+bridge_> But these days we have new clients popping faster than js runtimes 14:35 <+bridge_> lmao 14:35 <+bridge_> I have a same idea of weekly Teeworlds news series, but in the end, I did it yearly :3 14:36 <+bridge_> it's still named weekly Teeworlds news though. 14:40 <+bridge_> Chillerdragon, would you give me an interview? 15:01 <+bridge_> Sure 15:01 <+bridge_> @remakepower: nice good job for actually doing it 15:02 <+bridge_> But nobody can beat the daily dune 15:02 <+bridge_> He is a beast 16:09 <+bridge_> @robyt3 connecting players are counted towards the community number - idk if this is a bug or intended 16:14 <+bridge_> We're going to give you access to GitHub. 17:28 <+bridge_> just make the repo public lol 17:39 <+bridge_> i have on my local sever custom vote 17:39 <+bridge_> if i change directory use vote i lost from vote list my custom vote 17:39 <+bridge_> how add custom vote every time 17:39 <+bridge_> in autoexec i wrote custom vote 17:51 <+bridge_> "Well, because he kind of put a lot of effort into it, thinking the code would be closed. If it were open, he probably wouldn’t have put that much effort into it" 17:51 <+bridge_> 17:51 <+bridge_> "well, even if it’s open 17:51 <+bridge_> so what?" 17:51 <+bridge_> 17:51 <+bridge_> "They’ll steal the source code and then pass it off as their own client with features that could even become more popular than ours" 17:51 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466838194480873524/image.png?ex=697e3306&is=697ce186&hm=e556a3e9296ce896f88249f86d0cabf04d131343adc7083d18b020fdb18dacbb& 17:51 <+bridge_> :emodziidk: 17:54 <+bridge_> ur acting like tclient, eclient, rushie client etc hasnt put alot of effort into their clients either 17:55 <+bridge_> I'm not saying they're not making an effort, but in comparison, our client will be far ahead in terms of functionality. 17:56 <+bridge_> and are you going to take features from other clients? 17:57 <+bridge_> 5-10 percent 17:57 <+bridge_> isnt that hypocritical 17:57 <+bridge_> Personally, I'm not against it 17:57 <+bridge_> Noxi, I don't mind 17:58 <+bridge_> Noxy, I don't mind 17:58 <+bridge_> Noxy, don't mind 17:58 <+bridge_> gdgkdk 17:58 <+bridge_> sec 17:58 <+bridge_> so ur going to take features from other clients but you dont want people taking ur features 17:58 <+bridge_> Noxy, not against it 17:59 <+bridge_> The second developer and I are not against open source, but the third one is against it for now. 18:00 <+bridge_> This is my dialogue with the fact that I don't mind 18:00 <+bridge_> Here's a dialogue with the second developer 18:10 <+bridge_> Write me a private message, let me just show you what we'll have in the client 18:10 <+bridge_> you guys seem passionate about it, i respect it 18:10 <+bridge_> 18:10 <+bridge_> but i dont quite understand what this has to do with DDNet :p 18:10 <+bridge_> ?? 18:11 <+bridge_> We are discussing the fact that the code in our ddnet client is closed. 18:18 <+bridge_> whats the nickname of third one 18:18 <+bridge_> ill rape 18:18 <+bridge_> make it closed source or not, your code, your choice - still not DDNet related 18:18 <+bridge_> it seems like you're simply trying to advertise your new Client and defend the fact you won't open-source it. none of these things belong in here IMO. 18:18 <+bridge_> @manikoo pls dont say this stuff. 18:19 <+bridge_> cheat client* 18:19 <+bridge_> @manikoo ???????? 18:19 <+bridge_> ok sorry 18:19 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466845226193780737/Discord_ZKl5kUUqJK.png?ex=697e3992&is=697ce812&hm=0dcd41b1316a9fd49459527b01b26036dc6fbcd48a0bb1d954fea5027d307230& 18:19 <+bridge_> BestClient(NOT A CHEAT) 18:19 <+bridge_> NOT A CHEAT makes me think its cheat 18:19 <+bridge_> i bet this third dev is cheater 18:19 <+bridge_> We've just been fucked over and over again. 18:19 <+bridge_> questions about cheats 18:20 <+bridge_> because hey look at this client: ddnet.org/downloads 18:20 <+bridge_> We're just tired of questions about cheats. 18:21 <+bridge_> Can I not answer? It's just that he's known here and I don't want to say anything bad about him without his knowledge. 18:27 <+bridge_> "known" 18:27 <+bridge_> cheater :Pepe_Hmmm: 18:28 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466847604699828277/image.png?ex=697e3bc9&is=697cea49&hm=29da5816f019690d90751234489fc381bc2c500c626fe9b364bfc532dd320e91& 18:28 <+bridge_> on this server, many people know him 18:29 <+bridge_> and I don't want to put him in a bad light here 18:29 <+bridge_> GJDGJSDGJKLD 18:29 <+bridge_> "bad light" 18:29 <+bridge_> for developing the best client that has ever existed? 18:29 <+bridge_> 18:29 <+bridge_> anyway, can we.. stop 18:29 <+bridge_> I don’t want to portray him negatively. 18:29 <+bridge_> what bad are you doing? saying the nickname is not bad 18:32 <+bridge_> In the sense that right now he’s the only one against opening the code. 18:32 <+bridge_> and this is what this whole dispute is about 20:04 <+bridge_> It counts the unfiltered number of clients, which is intended. The filters shouldn't affect it, I think that's confusing. 21:40 <+bridge_> because i would rather not be on discord all the time + i dont have it installed on my phone 21:40 <+bridge_> i just added a matrix bridge to my server too xd 21:41 <+bridge_> really? because I'm not an "admin" as you say 21:42 <+bridge_> i rly doubt any admin wants a new job of personally reviewing your code, if you want it "approved" on DDNet then open-source it. 21:46 <+bridge_> i see those guys pretty clownish 21:46 <+bridge_> So what’s the difference then whether the code is open only to the administration or to everyone? Either way, it can still be viewed, since the approval status is given by the administration anyway 21:46 <+bridge_> they are acting like defending nuke codes 21:47 <+bridge_> you're probably not going to get an admin reviewing your whole code, you're making your client seem important before it can be verifiably worth anyone's time. im not trying to be rude im just saying that it should be no admin's job 21:47 <+bridge_> and no, that is a naive way of viewing client acceptance. admins are not the only people to discover cheat clients. we hear about them from other users 21:48 <+bridge_> ⬆️ 21:48 <+bridge_> via reports, in game, other channels probably 21:48 <+bridge_> you could get an admin on board, to personally review your code, takes one @ 21:49 <+bridge_> 10 21:49 <+bridge_> @ 21:49 <+bridge_> but im just saying ur chances are low since you havent even shown any screenshots, videos, nothing 21:49 <+bridge_> just vague "numbers" of features 21:49 <+bridge_> it would be nice to show everything on github page 21:49 <+bridge_> with opened source 21:49 <+bridge_> :greenthing: 21:50 <+bridge_> easier for 40+ people to check someone's code, probably 1 person per file is done in some minutes 21:50 <+bridge_> it not like you are going to sell this client so why not 21:51 <+bridge_> i understand voldermort client, yeah they have to be closed 21:55 <+bridge_> Look, even if we ignore the fact that people might use our sources in their own clients, most people want to see the source code for trust and to make sure there are no cheats. If we give access to the administration and they say that the client has been checked and there are no cheats, viruses, etc., why can’t that be considered a fact of trust and absence of cheats? The whole debate revolves around openness for ordinary people 21:56 <+bridge_> admins have nothing to do with your client 21:56 <+bridge_> its a game made by communnity 21:56 <+bridge_> its a game made by community 21:56 <+bridge_> not admins 21:57 <+bridge_> forget a word "admin" 21:57 <+bridge_> dont use it here 21:57 <+bridge_> i dont think you understand what im saying 21:57 <+bridge_> admins are busy people with lives and those that might be willing to check your code are probably very few 21:58 <+bridge_> even if they check it a single time, if you make one update to your code, gg this is now a hired position, admins having to check every release 21:58 <+bridge_> since you dont open the code 21:58 <+bridge_> I mean that when the client is finished, we’ll go to the administration of ddrace to avoid people getting banned for using our client 21:58 <+bridge_> so open sourse 21:58 <+bridge_> if you open the code anyone can check it at any time for any release 21:58 <+bridge_> manikoo pls 21:59 <+bridge_> Now, I understand your position. 21:59 <+bridge_> manikoo is telling truth in right and straight way 21:59 <+bridge_> there is no way any admin is going to say "yes I sign up to be Roflik's bitch and personally check his code every time he pushes to github.com" 21:59 <+bridge_> it will not happen 22:00 <+bridge_> we dont even know if ur client is worth worrying about, you posted no screenshots or videos 22:00 <+bridge_> basically no one cares about your client and its your problem so open code and be gud 22:00 <+bridge_> I never said that 22:01 <+bridge_> have a good night 22:01 <+bridge_> manikoo you're really not helping 22:01 <+bridge_> I suggest we just leave this dispute and discuss all these issues after the release. 22:01 <+bridge_> :emodziidk: 22:01 <+bridge_> If you post screenshots and videos it will help 22:01 <+bridge_> maybe an admin is interested 22:02 <+bridge_> If you want, I can tell you in a private message what we will have in the client. 22:02 <+bridge_> that doesn't solve anything, just post about it here 22:02 <+bridge_> I'm not just suggesting that you see it for yourself. 22:02 <+bridge_> no one is going to steal your idea without posting code xD 22:02 <+bridge_> not from the standpoint of inspections 22:02 <+bridge_> bro why so secret 😭 😭 😭 22:02 <+bridge_> i rq this topic, you're not really listening to me 22:03 <+bridge_> his messages are like ragebait idk 22:03 <+bridge_> No, he means perfectly well, I'm just not understood and I tried and it's fine 22:03 <+bridge_> stop trying to make drama idk what you're doing man 22:04 <+bridge_> i don't understand this privacy 22:04 <+bridge_> open ot 22:04 <+bridge_> open it 22:04 <+bridge_> as you are on the beach 22:04 <+bridge_> and have big 22:04 <+bridge_> Maybe he just doesn't understand I'm not an admin 22:04 <+bridge_> idk 22:04 <+bridge_> but still i give up gg 22:05 <+bridge_> We don't even reveal the client's name so it doesn't get stolen :emodziidk: 22:05 <+bridge_> for what??? 22:05 <+bridge_> so that it doesn't get stolen 22:05 <+bridge_> you will sell this client? 22:05 <+bridge_> We'll make a patent for the name soon 22:05 <+bridge_> its a trademark?? 22:05 <+bridge_> BRO 22:05 <+bridge_> wtf 22:06 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466902338181791854/olhz47233tf18w32ku7u9k3g0zeakeay.png?ex=697e6ec3&is=697d1d43&hm=2570c3c212b682e5f2016300dd64df7603a3800d28387b56012cfb2db158ff42& 22:06 <+bridge_> get it off my eyes 22:06 <+bridge_> circus 22:06 <+bridge_> open cope and be free 22:06 <+bridge_> open code and be free 22:07 <+bridge_> You just spoke for ragebyte, so I decided like 22:07 <+bridge_> You just spoke for ragebite, so I decided like 22:07 <+bridge_> :emodziidk: 22:07 <+bridge_> auto translator 22:07 <+bridge_> a second 22:08 <+bridge_> is your client that popular so you have to keep everything in secret?? 22:08 <+bridge_> bro even t client is open source 22:08 <+bridge_> You were talking about ragebite, so I decided like 22:08 <+bridge_> thousands of people are using it 22:09 <+bridge_> and tater is good with thing that someone is copy pasting features 22:09 <+bridge_> it wont make their client better and nore popular 22:10 <+bridge_> its ok you are overpricing your work as a developer 22:10 <+bridge_> but 22:10 <+bridge_> take it easy 22:10 <+bridge_> you wont live long here if you are hiden 22:10 <+bridge_> without support from other people 22:11 <+bridge_> omagad im still 22:11 <+bridge_> You’re talking about taking functions from Tater, but you don’t even know what we have. 22:11 <+bridge_> i don't care, any non default client features are shit and its my point 22:12 <+bridge_> i don't need giga cool features to play this game 22:12 <+bridge_> i use asd, space and my mouse 22:12 <+bridge_> If it will stop the conversation, send me an archive of the source code in DMs and I'll look through it 22:12 <+bridge_> just this one time, then im not reading any of it again 22:13 <+bridge_> . 22:13 <+bridge_> you are being clown hiding it from us 22:13 <+bridge_> see gorp is open to look 22:13 <+bridge_> use this chance 22:14 <+bridge_> if ur client doesnt have fastinput kog players will not use it xd 22:15 <+bridge_> We will add a super anti-ping that will give you a negative ping and you will be able to see the future 22:15 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1223233069935231077/1277337868439785502/togif-38.gif 22:15 <+bridge_> 🤡 22:16 <+bridge_> Well, to be honest, we’re only about 30% done. I honestly don’t even understand why I started this argument. 22:16 <+bridge_> I came here just to find coders for our client. 22:17 <+bridge_> open source -> coders will come if they are interested 22:17 <+bridge_> that is true 22:17 <+bridge_> always, are you a coder? 22:17 <+bridge_> sometimes 22:17 <+bridge_> hes developer 22:17 <+bridge_> dont you see 22:18 <+bridge_> gg nothing to read 22:18 <+bridge_> i got ragebaited today 22:21 <+bridge_> Are you open to new proposals? 22:21 <+bridge_> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1466906277413126336/image.png?ex=697e726e&is=697d20ee&hm=1db75c496d6b7f96a6e075ba191ec28cfe9975be83f7aeac1bf8b616abf2faa9& 22:22 <+bridge_> :sideeye: 22:22 <+bridge_> idk 22:22 <+bridge_> if it's just a banner that says "hello, world" im gonna lose it 22:22 <+bridge_> XD 22:23 <+bridge_> https://giphy.com/gifs/james-doakes-car-meme-12s2PXFPfJXUcHHjWR 22:23 <+bridge_> How does he know 22:24 <+bridge_> guys 22:24 <+bridge_> stop it 22:24 <+bridge_> let him lose hope 22:24 <+bridge_> in his "BEST CLIENT" 22:25 <+bridge_> https://tenor.com/view/hand-shake-sup-homie-dap-up-whats-up-greeting-gif-14436809 22:25 <+bridge_> https://tenor.com/view/pipotam-baby-hippo-hippo-wash-shower-gif-3406421565683572068 22:25 <+bridge_> see 22:25 <+bridge_> corgerms 22:25 <+bridge_> what do you think about pipo 22:25 <+bridge_> 22:26 <+bridge_> yee its happy 22:26 <+bridge_>