00:10 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> wehn a twinbop and its creator love eachother very much
00:11 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> out comes a chillerdragon
00:11 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 😊
00:13 < bridge> <Ewan> i still dont get it
02:07 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> some things are better learnt at an older age :D
02:11 < bridge> <teero777> will we get accounts someday chillerbot?
02:11 < bridge> <teero777> !roll 0 1
02:11 < chillerbot> 0
02:11 < bridge> <teero777> okay gg
02:25 < bridge> <louis> u cant coin flip it
02:25 < bridge> <louis> probability / 100 of accounts ever chillerbot
02:25 < bridge> <louis> !roll
02:25 < chillerbot> 90
02:25 < bridge> <louis> fake
02:52 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> `Value = 3.166667e+01`
02:52 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> aka 31.7 plz
03:00 < bridge> <teero777> do `%a` for more accurate reprensentation
03:00 < bridge> <teero777> you just gotta learn to read it xd
03:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its what my ide does
06:33 < bridge> <ryozuki> morning
07:10 < bridge> <pioooooo> Morning femboys and others
07:12 < bridge> <Ewan> gm
07:13 < bridge> <Ewan> apparently you cannot set the path to an existing git binary in the zed editor
07:13 < bridge> <Ewan> kinda mind boggling
08:46 < bridge> <ryozuki> https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/ioapic-interrupts
09:24 < bridge> <ryozuki> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401103304456409098/image.png?ex=688f0ea3&is=688dbd23&hm=0b9d44e766776255356767be1cb45139d26f50e8e189229ae8288e907f467497&
09:24 < bridge> <ryozuki> pog got keyboard working, cuz i went hard way and use uefi instead of bios, the old pic is disabled, to i had to setup a local apic and i/o apic
09:24 < bridge> <ryozuki> and parse de acpi table
09:24 < bridge> <ryozuki> :justatest:
09:24 < bridge> <ryozuki> and parse the acpi table
09:59 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Robyt3 what do you think about some kind of label for things that could make the client too op?
10:00 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** like improved dummy controls, console turing machines, or aim binds like #10561 
10:00 < chillerbot> https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/issues/10561
10:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** imo especially with those kind of issues we could use some help. Because most devs active on github are actually no power users who interact with that kind of stuff.
10:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** For example there are a few people that can do things with their dummy which totally goes over the head of the active devs.
10:33 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 1 - Milkeeys day is good
10:33 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 2 - Milkeeys day is average
10:33 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 3 - Milkeeys day is bad
10:33 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> !roll 1 3
10:33 < chillerbot> 2
10:34 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 1 - greet everyone
10:34 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 2 - greet devs only
10:34 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 3 - greet noone
10:34 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> !roll 1 3
10:34 < chillerbot> 2
10:34 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> Morning devs
10:36 < bridge> <milkeeycat> 1 - say "i use tmux btw"
10:36 < bridge> <milkeeycat> 2 - say "i use neovim btw"
10:36 < bridge> <milkeeycat> 3 - say "i use rust btw"
10:36 < bridge> <milkeeycat> !roll 1 3
10:36 < chillerbot> 1
10:36 < bridge> <milkeeycat> i use tmux btw
10:44 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** spammers
10:45 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 1 - we are spammers
10:45 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 2 - we are no spammers
10:45 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> 3 - chillerdragon is a spammer
10:45 < bridge> <Jupstar ✪> !roll 1 3
10:45 < chillerbot> 3
10:46 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** <:justatest:572499997178986510>
10:47 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** the bot is rigged
10:47 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** !roll 0 1
10:47 < chillerbot> 1
10:49 < bridge> <bumm.> Will we get accounts this year?
10:50 < bridge> <bumm.> !roll 0 1
10:50 < chillerbot> 0
10:50 < bridge> <bumm.> :feelsbadman:
10:55 < bridge> <01000111g> Will we all make it?
10:55 < bridge> <01000111g> !roll 0 1
10:55 < chillerbot> 0
10:55 < bridge> <01000111g> gg
10:56 < bridge> <milkeeycat> In what year will accounts be finished?
10:56 < bridge> <milkeeycat> !roll 2025 2025
10:56 < chillerbot> 2025
10:56 < bridge> <01000111g> omg nice
10:57 < bridge> <kebscs> does it do anything when sixup doesnt have the entities?
10:57 < bridge> <kebscs> doors, draggers etc
11:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @kebscs the wrong value is currently not being red if that is what your asking
11:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** but its still wrong
11:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** !ping
11:04 < chillerbot> pong
11:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** remove roll command because of spam?
11:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** !roll 0 1
11:04 < chillerbot> 1
11:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ok bye
11:40 < bridge> <robyt3> Not sure if it needs a separate label besides `needs-discussion`. Maybe add a label for issues that propose changes to client input.
11:46 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i see
11:49 < bridge> <robyt3> @sollybunny Please update some of your open PRs before opening even more :justatest:
11:50 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** road to 69 prs
12:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @robyt3 u said "That should already be realised by incrementing ANTIBOT_ABI_VERSION. Antibot always needs to be recompiled at the same time as the server or it usually results in crashes anyway."
12:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** u sure about that?
12:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** that should only be the case of the abi version also changed not every recompile
12:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** s/of/if/
12:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/9407#pullrequestreview-2652799597
12:06 < bridge> <robyt3> I think other changes also caused problem in the past, because some base code is shared. For example https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/commit/18cfbb53f9824dc35b07750302f310d1e3f66b63 broke ABI compatiblity
12:07 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** shared in the ABI it self or in the ab module ddnet uses?
12:08 < bridge> <robyt3> I don't know the implementation either, but I assume it only dynamically links the functions
12:08 < bridge> <robyt3> #6352
12:08 < bridge> <DDNet> https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/issues/6352
12:08 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** the way i understood it the antibot module should not call any server symbols and its binary should be distributable to any ddnet server with the same ABI version
12:09 < bridge> <robyt3> yeah, that would be ideal, but I think it still uses base functions
12:09 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** lerato once shared some ab compilation command and heinrich also revealed some internals via email based on that i assumed that ddnet antibot is fully selfcontained
12:10 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** in antibob i use base functions too but i do not depend on them being compatible with the server o.O
12:10 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i only depend on the log_info etc functions not to change
12:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i just reimplemented mem_copy in my antibot module, ez 
12:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://github.com/ChillerDragon/antibob/blob/8cdbaff5b56f5f377d75f244ad077920f4942531/src/ddnet/polybob/base/system.cpp#L137
12:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i got no crashes so far
12:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i dont even need the server source to compile
12:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** so i can also target closed source ddnet servers with my antibot module
12:12 < bridge> <robyt3> yeah, that probably makes more sense
12:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i was 100% sure ddnet does that too
12:12 < bridge> <robyt3> I assume we wouldn't have had the then issue
12:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i see
12:12 < bridge> <robyt3> I assume we wouldn't have had the issue then
12:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** thats why im asking, interesting
12:13 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ez ddnet social engineer reverse engineering
12:13 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** chillerbot-zx gonna go brr
12:24 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 👀
12:28 < bridge> <ChnFreddie> chillerdragon: it's yours
12:29 < bridge> <melon> Chiller on his way to distribute his module just for it to be sold within 30 minutes
12:30 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** oke fred thanks for the response withing 0 business days @ChnFreddie 
12:32 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @melon nah im not rookie my antibot saas will not be binary open. The antibot module you get will just send input data to my backend server and get a http response if it is a cheater or not.
12:33 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** voldemort devs are making big stonks right now but you dont understand how unimaginable rich i will be when i start to suck in all donation money from any server provider 
12:33 < chillerbot> You can see donors and how to donate here https://ddnet.org/funding/
12:33 < bridge> <melon> lol
12:33 < bridge> <melon> Idk as a server owner having to rely on a flag system I don't control..
12:34 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** its antibot in the cloud with monthly license fee
12:34 < bridge> <melon> ew
12:34 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i think you dont understand how op my ab is
12:34 < bridge> <melon> Hey you sniffed me okay
12:34 < bridge> <melon> I helped
12:34 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** xd
12:34 < bridge> <melon> I get atleast 25%
12:34 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ok fair
12:35 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** you will also continue to work 40h a week right?
12:35 < bridge> <melon> On the other hand, is your ab's focus on fng ?
12:35 < bridge> <melon> :feelsbadman:
12:35 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://tenor.com/view/money-gif-11341170073272671015
12:35 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** as the first employee of zillyhuhn ab enterprise and partners
12:35 < bridge> <melon> :kek:
12:35 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @melon no
12:35 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** its just tested mainly on fng because thats the only source of cheaters i have
12:36 < bridge> <melon> Open up a copy love box server
12:36 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i added some command to redirect all cheaters to another server
12:36 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** helped to get players in zcatch xd
12:36 < bridge> <melon> Ez sniffing 40 botters each day
12:36 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** good idea actually
12:36 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** but i have enough data for now
12:36 < bridge> <melon> There is never enough test data while fighting 10x devs
12:37 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** xd
12:37 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** melon voldemort dev fanboi
12:37 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** my ab has a 100% detection rate for the illegal cheat client chillerbot-zx
12:38 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** so i think 50$ is a fair monthly fee for 200 ab check requests
12:38 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** wait? monthly and per request? ye i guess 200 tops and you have to repay every month even if you use 0 
12:38 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** sounds fair
12:39 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** work on tclient=1 work on ddnet=0
12:39 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** !roll 0 1
12:39 < chillerbot> 1
12:39 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ez
12:40 < bridge> <melon> Nooo chiller, 5 free requests and 20cents each
12:40 < bridge> <melon> Nooo chiller, 5 free requests and 20cents each after
12:40 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** also sounds good
12:41 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** lure them in
12:46 < bridge> <ChnFreddie> spam
12:59 < bridge> <avolicious> This doesnt scale well sadly
12:59 < bridge> <Assa> @robyt3 I am thinking about changing EditorHistoryLogic, removing `Redo` and adding `Apply` instead, which also takes a bool `first`. So instead of doing an editor operation, you create the history object and apply it. This would also allow us to unit test them
13:06 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @avolicious how do i obtain the name ChillerDragon on beta servers?
13:06 < bridge> <avolicious> Just login
13:07 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** did not work for me
13:08 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon you commented to 2 issues then went back 2 ddnet x-x
13:08 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1754132904.png
13:09 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) nah didnt do ddnet yet i will try one tater issue to please the holy oracle chillerbot rng
13:09 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** its bad karma to ignore its response
13:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> you could do chatbubbles
13:09 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** nah too hard
13:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> if you want
13:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> (i dont wan to)
13:09 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** xd
13:10 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** first i gotta yap up avo
13:10 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its like ui
13:10 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> but in game
13:10 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> can you partition for enabling of /practice while youre at it
13:10 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** practice for noobs
13:10 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** we need /swap
13:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** and /map
13:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) tclient doesnt have client side /practice? cringe
13:11 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> auisd how
13:11 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> you want it to tas?
13:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** just spin up local server
13:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> oh right
13:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> no
13:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> wheres the convenience in that
13:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** well it would be as convenient
13:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** because you can do it mid run without kill
13:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> playing maps alone on a solo server is extremley lonely
13:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> playing maps alone on a lan server is extremley lonely
13:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** u practice w friends?
13:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** cant relate got no friends
13:16 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) why is tater CI such a wasteland
13:16 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** go merge some prs
13:16 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> did i fuck it
13:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i sent like 4 prs to fix CI and its still not done
13:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ah mate i havent enabled github push notificatons
13:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> im an absolute wreckkk
13:21 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** fr
13:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i dont want to get 20 emails when working on tclient
13:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** pls fix
13:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon my pc just died due to you
13:25 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** deserved
13:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> Bruh
13:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> I got the 5 beeps of doom
13:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> Then it just turns on?
13:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> The fuck
13:27 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> It only beeps when there's an hdmi shoved into it?
13:28 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> Bruh whatttt the fuck
13:30 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** maybe u wiggled the hdmi
13:32 < bridge> <robyt3> The rename doesn't seem necessary, I prefer the naming of `Undo`/`Redo`, otherwise it should be `Apply`/`Unapply`. And there are already various `Apply` functions in some editor actions. Ideally, all editor actions would only be implemented by `IEditorAction`s being executed on editor histories. You can already unit test the editor in its current state I think.
13:38 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon no it was the cable of doom
13:38 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> which i had lost into the pile of others since moving
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon i handnt got dilation errors before
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> now i have
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> what did u do
13:42 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i sshd into github server and did some trolings
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> can u fix it x-x
13:42 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i guess you turned on your email notifications
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> (idrc about messy commit history)
13:42 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** btw i think i know how i caused the issues
13:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> no u told me there was waiitng prs
13:43 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** they were hidden by other issues i fixed
13:43 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> but the pr was changing all the imgs
13:43 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** fail fast ah type beat
13:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon are you fixing it or should i
13:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i dont want to step on ur toes
13:47 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** dilate?
13:48 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i wanna get ma feature merged first you can fix in the meantime
13:48 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> okayy ill try
13:56 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) nsfw https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1754135757.png
13:57 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> yah u got a problem wiutht aht
13:57 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** no its hot
13:57 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> epic
13:58 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** lmao chillerbot-ux had same git conflict like tater
13:58 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> where?
13:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> for when you pulled master?
13:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> for when you pulled master in ur pr?
13:59 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ye
13:59 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** some bitsh edited bottom of client.h class
13:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i wish u could cancel multiple gh workflows at once
13:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> gameclient?
13:59 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** engine client
13:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ah, my ide was hiding the file
13:59 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** its probably some antibot measurement
14:00 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** to annoy cheat devs
14:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> right
14:00 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** right
14:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> if they have to wade through merge conflicts
14:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> theyw ill stop making cheats
14:00 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** fr
14:00 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** or stop updating and eat version bans
14:01 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> x-x
14:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** rossbit is antibot pinoeer smh
14:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** pinoeer
14:01 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> pioneer
14:01 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ?
14:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** yes xd
14:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) u should be ddnet maintainer contributing to tclient was fun af
14:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> epic
14:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> no more tlcient contributions for the next 6m then?
14:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> no more tlcient contributions for the next 6mon then?
14:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i have one epic pr pipelined
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> is it chat bubbles 😵‍💫
14:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** non nsfw commit messages are cool right?
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> uhmm
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> they are prefered
14:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** xd
14:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** nice
14:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** will tater go bonkers when he is back?
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> have useen commit history
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its mostly me
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> apart from at release where he undoes some stuff
14:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** wowo u the goat
14:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> then 👍
14:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> thanks
14:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i used to havea  client
14:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> then the merge conflicts came
14:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> and i evacuated my features to tclient
14:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** one botter down
14:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> noo
14:08 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) oke now im done with tclient for 6 months
14:10 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i guess uve done as much as teero lmao
14:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** hrhrhrhr
14:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1754136719.png
14:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @robyt3 maintaining my udp dumper branch is becoming annoying. I am about to nuke it. Concluding the asan -1 datasize issue is caused by packets hallucinated on the server side and not sent by the client
14:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** or what do you think?
14:17 < bridge> <manikoo> white
14:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401177201419878535/image.png?ex=688f5375&is=688e01f5&hm=b115c642449d9280a3f92e22f94c7177142852f6f37baac0a70f4f24db0fac12&
14:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** updating my daily driver client right now is: merge chillerbot-ux into ddnet, merge chillerbot-zx into chillerbot-ux, merge zx branch into tmp_dbg_patch branch
14:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) hot that you are co author there
14:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** wait you are not 12 right?
14:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> im moderator silly
14:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i have to look atleast 16
14:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** still weird
14:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> (im 19, no one wished me happy birthday)
14:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** forgot i said anything im over 40 years old
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** when bday?
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> oop
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 9 july
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** old souly
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> bruh
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> youre 40
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** rude
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** what is my age?
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> well considering youre actually oevr 40
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> im being nice
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** !roll
14:19 < chillerbot> 91
14:19 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** <:justatest:572499997178986510>
14:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> :)
14:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> omw to test it holdon
14:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401178416010494112/image.png?ex=688f5497&is=688e0317&hm=f08434eefd82d625eeeeedce8222458db929e6c9e8cdcb22a50faf5c87427ab0&
14:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i wish cmake was smarter about git
14:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** enjoy sexfaults
14:23 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> from all the dilation
14:23 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** dilusional tclient
14:24 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** we gotta fix the weird integration test caused by merge tho
14:24 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i smh wanna see the CI green
14:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon warlist was implemented without looking at you
14:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 👀
14:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> name near finish i did look at urs
14:25 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** a
14:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> delololololeoleueleule
14:25 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** tru u even posted here
14:25 < bridge> <Assa> What I mean is we have a lot of actions which are applied and then a history object is created, instead of vise versa
14:26 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** commenting on my genius IsNearFinish code
14:26 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> it was no genuis
14:26 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** rude
14:26 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> im sorry why you checking a checkerboard pattern
14:26 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** dont u dare shame my code
14:27 < bridge> <robyt3> That's what I mean. Editor actions are objects in the history, implementing the command pattern.
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon it didndt fail
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401180492644221078/image.png?ex=688f5686&is=688e0506&hm=54b6a585393e560fb1786061490466be13fca00ee13b1049956c53f79f13f9af&
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> it just shows red
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> when its not done
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> stupiod
14:31 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> AH I KNOW WHY IT CANT DILATE
14:32 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> AH I KNOW WHY IT CANT DILATE (tclient context)
14:50 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) do you accept patches for t#48 ? its the oldest and most upvoted issue
14:50 < chillerbot> https://github.com/sjrc6/TaterClient-ddnet/issues/48
14:51 < bridge> <Assa> thx @kebscs ❤️
14:53 < bridge> <kebscs> the tune tile pr?
14:53 < bridge> <kebscs> np
14:54 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** loony tunes ah pr
14:54 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** omg guys i had too much coffee
14:57 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon melon started workingon it and probably died to feature creep @blaiszephyr
14:57 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** so i can pick it up? xd
14:58 < bridge> <Assa> `draws a catoonish tunnel in the whole, sees bird skin player disappear`
14:58 < bridge> <Assa> `draws a catoonish tunnel in the wall, sees bird skin player disappear`
14:58 < bridge> <Assa> man my cofee still needs to do it's job
14:58 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** :coffee:
15:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon wait for @blaiszephyr
15:00 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @blaiszephyr
15:00 < bridge> <melon> ChillerDragon: its basically ready but i didnt like the way the potato looked so i dumped the entire thing, feel free to pick it up
15:00 < bridge> <melon> 
15:00 < bridge> <melon> make it look good tho.
15:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** send ur code
15:01 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** open draft pr
15:02 < bridge> <melon> if i say i dumped the entire thing, i mean it
15:02 < bridge> <melon> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401188394503114853/image.png?ex=688f5de2&is=688e0c62&hm=40a21a3a7a1d93f5c698dc899b1d507ad0daaf31c69d569a456f1a21b5e9c2b7&
15:02 < bridge> <melon> :kek:
15:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ewwww
15:02 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** can u pls put such kind of windows screenshots in a spoiler behind a trigger warning
15:03 < bridge> <melon> :nobytroll:
15:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @blaiszephyr try reflog
15:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> they may be hiding
15:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** reflog never forgets
15:03 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** unless u wipe the .git or do git garbage collector stuff
15:03 < bridge> <melon> cd ../ && sudo rm -rf ddnet && git clone git@github.com:ddnet/ddnet.git
15:04 < bridge> <melon> `cd ../ && sudo rm -rf ddnet && git clone git@github.com:ddnet/ddnet.git`
15:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @melon how can it not look good btw?
15:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> undilated image of potato from google is fine
15:04 < bridge> <melon> it was just a potato, i wanted it to be a cool RGB rotating potato
15:04 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> and pl;ay mlg music?
15:04 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1754139882.png
15:05 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** the issue does not specify rgb btw
15:05 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://youtu.be/H4FbRfeOl-8?t=20 (timestamped)
15:06 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://youtu.be/EXEbZPQHVTg
15:06 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> the hit sound would be epic for osu
15:11 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** @Solly (bun bun) u force pushed my ass
15:11 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> uhh yeah
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> rebase your ass
15:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** oke
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> git rebase HEAD~1 --onto tater/master
15:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ``git reset --hard tater/master``
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> but ur changes!!
15:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** a no changes
15:12 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** my master broke
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> git reset --soft HEAD~1
15:12 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> git stash
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> git reset --hard tater/master
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> git stash pop
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> :)
15:13 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** git stash poop
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> rebase is overrated
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> oh good point i have some important stuff on my stash
15:13 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> which i stashed due to doing ur chagnes
15:14 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** u recover stuff from ur stash?
15:14 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://zillyhuhn.com/cs/.1754140436.png
15:14 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** my stashes tend to get forgettn forever
15:16 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i only got 28
15:16 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> most of them are garbage due to my misuse of stash as rebasing
15:16 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i mostly use it as a stack
15:16 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> to move changes around without having to deal with git
15:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> get this commit from here to here without dying? use stash today!
15:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** what the windows want?
15:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://github.com/ChillerTater/TaterClient-ddnet/blob/8716ec301b2464602b96e7e3b46f0fb8ec86d9bb/src/game/client/components/tclient/mod.cpp#L148
15:17 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** ``C:/mingw64/lib/gcc/x86_64-w64-mingw32/12.2.0/include/c++/bits/char_traits.h:431:56: error: 'void* __builtin_memcpy(void*, const void*, long long unsigned int)' accessing 9223372036854775810 or more bytes at offsets [2, 9223372036854775807] and 1 may overlap up to 9223372036854775813 bytes at offset -3 [-Werror=restrict]``
15:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ognna need more info
15:18 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** https://github.com/sjrc6/TaterClient-ddnet/actions/runs/16693651702/job/47254747218
15:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ah yea
15:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> had this issue in master too
15:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> idk how it got solved
15:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i think its to do with internal use of signed ints
15:19 < bridge> <melon> that bytecount just screams overflow
15:19 < bridge> <melon> is the passed var uninitialized?
15:19 < bridge> <melon> is the passed int uninitialized?
15:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> `m_Content = "'" + std::string(pStr) + "' is not a valid id";`
15:19 < bridge> <melon> is the passed int uninitialized / can it be?
15:19 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> pstr is passed in
15:20 < bridge> <melon> if (pStr && *pStr) { };
15:20 < bridge> <melon> i assume pStr is just garbage
15:20 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> pStr isnt garbage ):<
15:20 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its clients[id].m_aName
15:20 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> it cant be garbage
15:20 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** have you played on kog before?
15:21 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i have seen some garbage names 
15:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i assume they are null terminated atleast
15:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> due to client verification
15:21 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** what if the client is not connected?
15:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> then you cant get this msg
15:21 < bridge> <melon> pass it in directly then :Clueless:
15:21 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** maybe just dont use std::string 
15:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> but its just so convenient
15:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 😭
15:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** use char like gigachad <:gigachad:960830678465933403>
15:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** souly the soy dev
15:22 < bridge> <melon> `m_Content = "'" + clients[id].m_aName + "' is not a valid id";`
15:22 < bridge> <melon> nothing supposedly stops you from doing this
15:22 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** wtf melon
15:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> oh wait
15:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> thats from command
15:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> not client
15:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> so it defiantley cant be invalid
15:23 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** must be compiler bug then
15:23 < ws-client> **<ChillerDragon>** i will email bill gates sec
15:23 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> theres already a issue
15:24 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> same happens on a few versions of gcc i thinks
15:24 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
15:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> maybe ill just assert its length
15:48 < bridge> <robyt3> Try to convert each term to an `std::string` (or only the first one?), I think I've seen something similar in another PR, but I don't know why this happens either
15:51 < bridge> <forgottenabscat> I found this eariler, and fixed by using .append()
15:52 < bridge> <forgottenabscat> Same +operator on string and const char*
17:18 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> why does my fps drop so much when seeking thorugh a demo by tick
17:21 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> because it uses SetPos which goes through the file again
17:22 < bridge> <robyt3> Use profiler, or add `time_get_nanoseconds` calls to measure average seeking time
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```cpp
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     // playback everything until we hit our tick
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     while(m_Info.m_NextTick < WantedTick && IsPlaying())
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         DoTick();
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
17:22 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ):
17:36 < bridge> <keepsecrets8> why is there a blank when i am choosing custom res?
17:36 < bridge> <keepsecrets8> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401227093756608552/image.png?ex=688f81ec&is=688e306c&hm=f4198a1b6706113e473f02a4c2408dbe7c12428b114d562e452cb09082d9d300&
17:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ddnet has a limits on resolution
17:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> tclient has tc_any_resolution
17:42 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> well uhh i think the comparison from half my fps to instant is pretty good
17:44 < bridge> <robyt3> The question is which code in particular
17:45 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> well its gotta be the loop
17:45 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> goes back to last keyframe then runs forward again which is uneeded
17:45 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> instead of just going forward
17:45 < bridge> <robyt3> I prefer measurements
17:45 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its gonna be a big number x-x
17:45 < bridge> <robyt3> Or a fully mathematical proof
17:46 < bridge> <robyt3> Or a full mathematical proof
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> if i hold down `.`
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> in ddnet i get 60fps
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> in ddnet +
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```cpp
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     if(WantedTick == m_Info.m_NextTick + 1)
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     {
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         DoTick();
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         Play();
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         return true;
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     }
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ``` i get 120fps
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> if i hold down `.`
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> in ddnet i get 60fps
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> in ddnet +
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```cpp
17:46 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     if(WantedTick == m_Info.m_NextTick + 1)
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     {
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         DoTick();
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         Play();
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         return true;
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     }
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ``` i get 120fps (my max fps)
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> is that not rigerous
17:47 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> of course i should probably make that general if its within the keyframe to not go backwards instead of only handling going forward a single tick
17:49 < bridge> <robyt3> If you only want to go to the next tick, then you could maybe just play the demo for a precise time, then it would even be smoothed with intra tick.
17:49 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> this isnt about normal playback
17:49 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its about seeking
17:49 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its about seeking (using SetPos)
17:50 < bridge> <robyt3> As I said, measure what is actually slow about it inside those functions
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```cpp
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     size_t KeyFrame = std::clamp<size_t>(m_vKeyFrames.size() * Percent, 0, m_vKeyFrames.size() - 1);
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     while(KeyFrame < m_vKeyFrames.size() - 1 && m_vKeyFrames[KeyFrame].m_Tick < KeyFrameWantedTick)
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         KeyFrame++;
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     while(KeyFrame > 0 && m_vKeyFrames[KeyFrame].m_Tick > KeyFrameWantedTick)
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         KeyFrame--;
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> this could be binary search right?
17:50 < bridge> <robyt3> Would probably be slower
17:50 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> in a large demo tho
17:51 < bridge> <robyt3> This already does a lookup using the percentage
17:51 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its probably not that long
17:51 < bridge> <robyt3> It's not binary, it's just goes to the correct keyframe +-2 immediately I guess
17:51 < bridge> <robyt3> It's not binary, it just goes to the correct keyframe +-2 immediately I guess
17:52 < bridge> <robyt3> You'd have to test and measure how accurate this is, probably depends on the amount of data per keyframe being similar
17:52 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> i dont think tahts the main part
17:53 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> am measuring :P
17:55 < bridge> <robyt3> Should be simple with `time_get_nanoseconds` calls around relevant blocks, then aggregate the values and count how many samples you have, then log results after a while
17:55 < bridge> <robyt3> Or actual profiler
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 2025-08-02 15:54:55 I DEBUG: find keyframe = 562
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 2025-08-02 15:54:55 I DEBUG: seek file = 11897
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 2025-08-02 15:54:55 I DEBUG: play = 42086798
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
17:55 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> (nanoseconds)
17:56 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> they change quite alot but are withint he same order of magnitue
17:56 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> they change quite alot but are withint he same order of magnitude
17:56 < bridge> <robyt3> You need to measure at least a few thousand times to get comparable results
17:56 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> sigh
17:56 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> im gonna get the same numbers
17:57 < bridge> <robyt3> The relative results will likely be the same, yeah
17:57 < bridge> <robyt3> But I think the times for the first two steps are not accurate with only one sample at that scale
17:58 < bridge> <h1dr4x> is there a way to find admin on ban mute kick etc. I'm making an audit log system
17:58 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> you can tell where the keyframes are becuase it starts at 120fps and slowly goes down to 30
17:59 < bridge> <robyt3> Not sure that's solvable, you need to replay the ticks to get the correct state, though visual effects are already skipped
17:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> not if youre going forwards
17:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> the player does already does it
17:59 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> just do what the player does every tick just once
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> Should be possible by looking for log messages like this:
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> ```
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> server: ClientId=0 authed with key=local-server (admin)
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> server: ClientId=0 rcon='muteid 0 30'
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> ```
18:01 < bridge> <robyt3> Then give all admins/mods different keys to identify them
18:02 < bridge> <h1dr4x> Thanks, now for the next hours I will be implementing this to my build
18:02 < bridge> <h1dr4x> Thanks, now for the next 24 hours I will be implementing this to my build
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```bash
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ ./DDNet > file
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ cat file | grep "DEBUG: seek" > fileseek
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ cat file | grep "DEBUG: find" > filefind
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ cat file | grep "DEBUG: play" > fileplay
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ awk '{ sum += $NF; count++ } END { if (count > 0) print sum / count }' fileseek     
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 7719.02
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ awk '{ sum += $NF; count++ } END { if (count > 0) print sum / count }' filefind
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 204.046
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> $ awk '{ sum += $NF; count++ } END { if (count > 0) print sum / count }' fileplay
18:02 < chillerbot> $ is reprecated reverse moved back to !
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 2.43504e+07
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
18:02 < bridge> <robyt3> :monkaStop:
18:02 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @chillerdragon
18:03 < bridge> <Assa> omg
18:03 < bridge> <Assa> `$$$$$`
18:03 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> the line has to start with a $
18:03 < bridge> <Assa> okay it's only the newlines
18:04 < bridge> <Assa> now we know a single message to get the bot banned ...
18:05 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> @robyt3 i forgot to record to file
18:05 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> but uhh
18:05 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401234416616869989/image.png?ex=688f88be&is=688e373e&hm=3579e8df188bfd381a44e60e40e5df178fd673211ea847022a79c72f1eb0b02f&
18:05 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> it takes as long to just play as it takes to find the right keyframe normally
18:06 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> its just doing less work... it shouldnt be controversial D:
18:07 < bridge> <robyt3> Seems good if it works and you can integrate it cleanly into `CDemoPlayer::SetPos` directly
18:07 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> yeah i can
18:07 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> cuz you know the current tick
18:07 < bridge> <robyt3> But also update your other open PRs
18:08 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> COUGH
18:08 < bridge> <robyt3> At least the ones with "Waiting for author" label
18:08 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> this isnt getting accepted ever is it
18:08 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401235268991717477/image.png?ex=688f8989&is=688e3809&hm=3b81d6a58ad9a9be5f146cdcfaf2914c2d54d744a1d2839b3976bf33ae021e8c&
18:09 < bridge> <robyt3> Not by me
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401235417365217371/image.png?ex=688f89ad&is=688e382d&hm=74f193c14082ea93d2d5c52e7c8a9168bbb904c642ce8886f84746212bc50978&
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 👀
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> theres a place for filters
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> !!
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> yeah i already tried that
18:09 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ima close it xd
18:14 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> the way keyframes are found feels very magic numbery
18:16 < bridge> <robyt3> yes, it was always magic, probably trial and error
18:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 204ns for finding the keyframe seems a bit steep
18:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 612 cycles
18:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 612 cycles at 3GHz
18:17 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> damn its fucking cool you can just do that
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```cpp
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         m_Info.m_NextTick = -1;
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         m_Info.m_Info.m_CurrentTick = -1;
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         m_Info.m_PreviousTick = -1;
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     }
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> 
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     // playback everything until we hit our tick
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>     while(m_Info.m_NextTick < WantedTick && IsPlaying())
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)>         DoTick();
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> ```
18:25 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> oh wait what
18:28 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> huh theres a frame in my demo where i get nothing
18:28 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401240319210819665/image.png?ex=688f8e3d&is=688e3cbd&hm=059ff5c5ccbef048ea0ad6db1067f226d11c8c160a5615878ed2334bd0cd7979&
18:28 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1401240338953273405/image.png?ex=688f8e42&is=688e3cc2&hm=0ac902ed44453b1c20d8396f7204596696cc897f99c186de8491f9ca30c7cdff&
18:29 < bridge> <Solly (bun bun)> without my changes
18:30 < bridge> <robyt3> No idea what you did, but demos only contain every second tick unless you recorded on a high bandwidth server
18:31 < bridge> <robyt3> Somewhat misleading that the buttons say "one tick"
19:55 < bridge> <melon> saying `one servertick` would be confusing for the regular user tho ig
19:56 < bridge> <robyt3> I'd use "Next tick" and "Previous tick" instead
20:00 < bridge> <Assa> #10589 is blocking me currently if anybody wants to keep me busy :justatest: oh and I wanted to review kebs, so this is not too urgent
20:00 < bridge> <DDNet> https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/10589
20:05 < bridge> <robyt3> I'll try to review it tomorrow. I think the files in the `map` folder should not include the editor (and ideally also not the gameclient).
20:23 < bridge> <Assa> editor should not be included (in headers), Gameclient might be hard, I need multpile backends like graphics, render map, IMap, ... currently using the subcomponent interface
20:28 < bridge> <Assa> if you insist on the editor, we could split the cpp file and move it to the editor
20:43 < bridge> <robyt3> The access from the map rendering directly game state like game tick doesn't really make sense. The map rendering should be a component that is used by the game and editor and not refer back to those. `CRenderTools` shouldn't be used, all envelope rendering related functions should be in the new files. Not sure about the component interfaces, maybe just add a `CMapRenderInterfaces` instead so it's separated.
20:44 < bridge> <robyt3> The access from the map rendering directly to the game state like game tick doesn't really make sense. The map rendering should be a component that is used by the game and editor and not refer back to those. `CRenderTools` shouldn't be used, all envelope rendering related functions should be in the new files. Not sure about the component interfaces, maybe just add a `CMapRenderInterfaces` instead so it's separated.
20:54 < bridge> <Assa> Envelopes need to access the intermediate ticks, but only ingame, or we reimplement this subtick logic
20:55 < bridge> <Assa> maybe we actually should, menu background map is bound to tickrate
20:55 < bridge> <Assa> I believe my PR is only an intermediate step for all of this