00:40 < bridge> Since when is ddnet client able to properly display projectiles in other tune zones? 00:40 < bridge> or while switching tune zones, so to say 00:45 < bridge> ------ 00:45 < bridge> I somehow broke a map I think? cant tele and switch tiles re-appearing after map reload 00:46 < bridge> I somehow broke a map I think? cant tele and switch and speedup tiles re-appearing after map reload 00:47 < bridge> ah, removing the tiles not by shift-selection worked 01:03 < ws-client> @animepdf lmao 01:03 < ws-client> @kollpotato pro 01:18 < bridge> it causes everything to be confused 01:18 < bridge> it thinks u have connection problems 01:18 < bridge> and u can barely move 01:18 < bridge> and u ping back and forth 01:18 < bridge> like packet loss 01:18 < bridge> but constantly more than uve ever fealt 01:28 < bridge> This is just bandwidth it doesn't change the speed of the game. 03:30 < bridge> ChillerDragon 03:35 < bridge> A wonderful man risu made a script in python, which allows you to output the necessary commands in tune to slow down / speed up the game, everything works great, but there is one drawback. At a deceleration of 4x or more , when reaching the peak height during a normal jump, the player stops falling for 0.5 seconds or more with each deceleration 03:45 < bridge> Is it possible to fix it 04:02 < ws-client> ddnet has more open pull requests than sdl 04:03 < ws-client> @woidless i am not going to mess with tunes 05:05 < bridge> Who should I contact? 05:26 < bridge> I think it's due to the game rounding very small velocities to 0, I could try to figure out where specifically that happens but obviously can't be fixed without changing the code 07:04 < bridge> Well, try it? 07:23 < bridge> You could ask the owners of the server you are trying to copy -.- 07:51 < bridge> *whips his coding slaves* 08:01 < bridge> He sells a SlowNet device for $4, I'm sorry, but it's not that clowning, it's moronism. This is implemented in a couple of commands in tune, and he evaluates them for $ 4. 08:01 < bridge> I want to implement it for free 08:44 < bridge> My neovim broke without a reason, wtf :pepeW: \ 08:44 < bridge> My neovim broke without a reason, wtf :pepeW: 08:44 < bridge> :nouis: 08:44 < bridge> what broke 08:44 < bridge> It just closes with exit code 0 when I try to open a directory 08:44 < bridge> lol 08:45 < bridge> emacs when? 08:45 < bridge> you make me sick 08:45 < bridge> use helix 08:46 < bridge> The only thing I'm annoyed with in neovim is that opening huge files isn't optimized. 08:46 < bridge> The only thing I'm annoyed at in neovim is that opening huge files isn't optimized. 08:50 < bridge> idk i like helix 08:50 < bridge> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1306526537679638529/image.png?ex=6736fd28&is=6735aba8&hm=182701de1fb22b4f6dd677543f75a6d51aa9605ac4d2da8e277aacb3d431c24b& 08:53 < bridge> Is it good? 08:53 < bridge> I've never tried it 08:54 < bridge> some things are different, but i just like that i dont need to tinker anything for it to be a functional code editor 08:56 < bridge> now ofc i did set this up with nix and not their toml format, but the only settings i changed were some keybinds like 08:56 < bridge> 08:56 < bridge> `f` for file picker in cwd 08:56 < bridge> `$` for goto_line_end 08:56 < bridge> `_` for goto_line_start 08:56 < bridge> 08:56 < bridge> etc, because i was used to those from vim 09:03 < bridge> helix is cool until you need to customize it 👍 09:04 < bridge> also... helix has a lot of kickass colorschemes 09:04 < bridge> I had some sus values in `.local/share/nvim/.netrwhist`, I removed them and now nvim works 09:05 < bridge> netrw :nouis: 09:47 < bridge> I thought it didn't work because it was pointing to non existing directories but I put one myself and it just deleted it, but worked as expected, weird :\ 09:49 < bridge> Who knows where in the code gravity is rounded to 0 if the value is very small 09:51 < bridge> @woidless choose a channel to ask these questions, dont ask the same in multiple please 09:52 < bridge> thx 10:32 < bridge> Search for quantize 10:48 < bridge> What is this? 12:23 < bridge> BRO LOL IT'S NOT, IM OWNER OF IT, WE ARE SELLING THE PROJECT WHICH WE TRYING TO GET TASNET LEVEL, WE NOW GOING TO USE THE CODE, NOT TUNES 12:26 < bridge> > WE ARE SELLING THE PROJECT WHICH WE TRYING TO GET TASNET LEVEL* 12:26 < bridge> 12:26 < bridge> what? 12:26 < bridge> > WE ARE SELLING THE PROJECT WHICH WE TRYING TO GET TASNET LEVEL 12:26 < bridge> 12:26 < bridge> what? 12:30 < bridge> he is trying to say that code is being written and they are trying to do something similar to TASNET 13:11 < bridge> ITS COPYRIGHTED 13:12 < bridge> Bro, and I leaked tune for free 13:13 < bridge> And moreover, what potential does slownet have, it's either slowing down or accelerating, it can't cost $4 13:13 < bridge> What are you going to bring to the tasnet level? slowing down? 13:30 < bridge> i rly enjoy slowmo servers in 2012 tbh 13:45 < bridge> u both are trying to copy something that got popular, you can cooperate instead 14:25 < bridge> I personally saw his idea, and saw that it sells it. I wanted to implement a completely free 14:26 < bridge> https://github.com/dailenson/One-DM 14:26 < bridge> handwriting is dead 14:26 < bridge> 14:26 < bridge> can we stop trying to make money out of FOSS software please :pepeW: 14:27 < bridge> i just got here, did someone sell ddnet 14:29 < bridge> let it be implemented for free* 14:29 < bridge> *whips his coding slaves again* 14:29 < bridge> :kek: 14:30 < bridge> *coding slaves cry in binary* 14:30 < bridge> i thought we don't use the s-word anymore 14:30 < bridge> you don't :0 14:33 < bridge> Stoping time, better slowing, time reverse etc. 14:46 < bridge> I mean, it's perfectly legal as long as you provide source :) 14:52 < bridge> copy**right** doesnt prevent people from doing it 😄 14:52 < bridge> *copy***right** doesnt prevent people from doing it 😄 14:52 < bridge> *copy**right*** doesnt prevent people from doing it 😄 14:53 < bridge> maybe copy*left* does 14:54 < bridge> to some degree 14:54 < bridge> copyfly 14:54 < bridge> copyleft is real 14:57 < bridge> just words ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:04 < bridge> SlowNET is popular?😨 15:04 < bridge> Slownet is popular?😨 15:13 < bridge> NO. We live in a capitalism. Must make money 15:13 < bridge> damn, tell deen to sell ddnet on steam for 10€ 15:13 < bridge> but keep it free on website :harold: 15:13 < bridge> time tracking costs 10€ now 15:14 < bridge> Thats what some MacOS apps do ^^ 15:14 < bridge> Pay if you want it from Apple Store, download it for free on homebrew 15:14 < bridge> Actually smart 15:14 < bridge> Because rich people use apple store anyways 15:15 < bridge> And please dont bring the argument that apple is too expensive. Compare Lenovo or any other business crap-ware against M1/M2/M3 15:15 < bridge> And please dont bring the argument that apple is too expensive. Compare Lenovo or any other business crap-ware against M1/M2/M3 :owo: 15:15 < bridge> in capitalism: wage slave 15:15 < bridge> in socialism: slave 15:16 < bridge> your guys's fault for not going all into crypto before trump became president 15:17 < bridge> still got time until january/february 15:17 < bridge> <.dartmonkey> It depends on the license 🤓 15:17 < bridge> Yeah, Solana a few years back. Was a nice hype 15:17 < bridge> sell your family and friends for crypto 15:17 < bridge> Yeah, bought Solana a few years back. Was a nice hype 15:18 < bridge> damn i sold them back then for doge.. what to do now 15:18 < bridge> well 15:18 < bridge> start gambling with shitcoins, I guess 15:18 < bridge> Invest in Shiba Inu 15:19 < bridge> i tried because @brokecdx forced me to - i lost all gg 15:19 < bridge> Invest in Shiba Inu :pepeH: 15:19 < bridge> hold your doge 15:20 < bridge> until Elongates Tusk joins Trump in office. 15:20 < bridge> So january? 15:21 < bridge> yep around that time 15:22 < bridge> thats why he is brokecdx and not richcdx 15:22 < bridge> Whats your prediction? Can we base a teeworlds coin on it? 15:22 < bridge> gamble ddnet donations 15:22 < bridge> :brownbear: 15:23 < bridge> doubt it. you need to be a rich internet troll with a big following 15:23 < bridge> We have reddit 15:23 < bridge> "rich" not necessarily bad 15:23 < bridge> and X 15:23 < bridge> twinbop NFT's when 15:24 < bridge> oof 15:24 < bridge> make nfts from the skin database 15:24 < bridge> First I wanted to add microtransactions to use a skin on gores servers 15:24 < bridge> Melon, you genius 15:24 < bridge> my wealth doesnt come from working hard, but hardly working 15:24 < bridge> :harold: 15:24 < bridge> but from 0.7 skins 15:24 < bridge> Then I will add microstransaction to actually play the game 15:24 < bridge> easier to generate 15:25 < bridge> After that has been implemented, we can start our NFT stuff 15:25 < bridge> passive income 15:25 < bridge> "this server is licensed, please enter a valid 10$ paysafecard code in to access it (one time use) - for permanent use, please go to thriftshop.kog.org and buy an unlimited license for 500% 15:25 < bridge> "this server is licensed, please enter a valid 10$ paysafecard code in to access it (one time use) - for permanent use, please go to thriftshop.kog.org and buy an unlimited license for 500$ 15:25 < bridge> "this server is licensed, please enter a valid 10$ paysafecard code in to access it (one time use) - for permanent use, please go to thriftshop.kog.org and buy an unlimited license for 500$" 15:26 < bridge> unlimited is too long - lifetime is better term 😄 15:26 < bridge> unlimited is bound to time, lifetime bound to a person 15:27 < bridge> nah imagine my child playing on my account and i die, and she feels all sad and stuff and the first thing that happens is the license running out 15:27 < bridge> "your lifetime ended" 15:27 < bridge> Damn 15:27 < bridge> But I would prefer a season pass 15:27 < bridge> recurring passive income every 6 months 15:27 < bridge> After all upgrading like FIFA does.. Just change the title from 2024 to 2025 and start from zero 15:28 < bridge> a battle pass with seasonal rewards (every 10th level is a single cosmetic for 1 week) - and it doesnt pay itself back so you have to spend money on it every month 15:28 < bridge> more ideas, yes sir 15:28 < bridge> wanna be `Senior Global Key Account Manager`? 15:34 < bridge> absolutely 15:40 < bridge> Paying for physics changes please!! I want a realllly long hook for 5€ 15:40 < bridge> Talk to @blaiszephyr he is senior global key account manager 15:40 < bridge> he will set up the deal 15:41 < bridge> discussing the details like pricing, discounts, duration 15:41 < bridge> Hi @blaiszephyr hi hi hi change euro to long hook 🥺🥺🥺🪝 15:43 < bridge> hey there @teero777, thanks for your request! 15:43 < bridge> i sadly have to inform you that our company is thriving to rise, and 5€ is nothing we can agree on at the time of writing. 15:43 < bridge> 15:43 < bridge> i can however offer you a great deal of an extended Hook range (+50%) or even the limitless Hook range (u64)! the prices are attached, thank you in advance and i hope to see you in game! 15:43 < bridge> 15:43 < bridge> extended hook: 49,99$ - tax 15:43 < bridge> limitless hook: 449,95$ - tax 15:43 < bridge> 15:43 < bridge> every cosmetic comes with a 3$ recovery fee, aswell as a 10$ cleanup fee. 15:43 < bridge> 15:43 < bridge> thanks! 15:43 < bridge> tasnet is 15:43 < bridge> hey there @teero777, thanks for your request! 15:43 < bridge> i sadly have to inform you that our company is thriving to rise, and 5€ is nothing we can agree on at the time of writing. 15:43 < bridge> 15:44 < bridge> i can however offer you a great deal of an extended Hook range (+50%) or even the limitless Hook range (u64)! the prices are attached, thank you in advance and i hope to see you in game! 15:44 < bridge> 15:44 < bridge> extended hook: 49,99$ - tax 15:44 < bridge> limitless hook: 449,95$ - tax 15:44 < bridge> 15:44 < bridge> every cosmetic comes with a 3$ recovery fee, as well as a 10$ cleanup fee. 15:44 < bridge> 15:44 < bridge> thanks! 15:44 < bridge> I want to pay -499$ for negative hook range pls 15:44 < bridge> ez exploit 15:44 < bridge> teero tell me the truth 15:44 < bridge> u were the real racer :justatest: 15:44 < bridge> no 15:44 < bridge> hi, i'm trying to write a command that will change SERVER_TICK_SPEED (I made it from an enum to a regular variable), but there is a problem when I use this command - if I was in flight, for example, I will start to fall VERY laggy, and if I'm standing, I can't do anything do and the message about connection problems flashes. and only after 5 minutes of this the speed finally changes (and during the change you cannot log into the server, alt 15:45 < bridge> Some rando *redacted* client user 15:45 < bridge> yahoo, ee have another one, guys :kek: 15:45 < bridge> whats up with slow motion servers man 15:45 < bridge> the game is hardcoded at 50tps for a reason. the dev set the value, and made the game without ever changing that. it is currently practically imposible to change the tickrate. 15:45 < bridge> kids love em 15:45 < bridge> Whats up with people changing SERVER_TICK_SPEED? 15:46 < bridge> server side TAS being popular ig 15:46 < bridge> The client does not know that the physics are different. Try doing cl_predict to 0 15:46 < bridge> I would never expect it to be this popular ngl. Same game, but slomo 15:46 < bridge> gm devs what’s on the agenda 15:46 < bridge> why is everyone changing tick speed?? 15:46 < bridge> gm Ewan, i have no idea :kek: 15:46 < bridge> oh LOL 15:46 < bridge> avo said the same thing 15:46 < bridge> :kek: 15:47 < bridge> also the client does not support any tick speed other than 50, you'll just get desync if you change that. 15:47 < bridge> To lower the tickspeed properly, I think you'd have to fill in the gaps with doubled up or interpolated snaps 15:47 < bridge> i mean, there is a thing where people swears 120tps is better than 60tps in CSGO 15:47 < bridge> It's much easier to bhop with 120 ticks 15:47 < bridge> same concept behind refresh rate 15:48 < bridge> i believe it 15:48 < bridge> im just changing this enum and in client 15:48 < bridge> it allows people to pretend they're good 15:48 < bridge> personally I find it quite fun to be able to shitfly with dummy 15:48 < bridge> the simple thing is that if I change the server_tick_speed variable in the code not with a command and build again everything is ok 15:48 < bridge> not with a command? 15:48 < bridge> i mean, it might be true, but i would pull a teeworlds here and say bhop shouldn't even be a thing 15:48 < bridge> :justatest: 15:48 < bridge> im codded command which changing server tick speed 15:48 < bridge> less aliasing is generally more better 15:49 < bridge> this wouldn’t work without a refactor to that variable 15:49 < bridge> it’s a preprocessor constant right? 15:50 < bridge> like the thing is that if I do it with a command, then it lags for 5 minutes and after that it changes the game speed 15:50 < bridge> i think i dont know what im talking about then 15:50 < bridge> it is possible that you've messed up the tick info in the packet in some way. maybe something is calculated with `tick = tickspeed * constant` and other things are implemented with `next_tick = next_tick + constant * tickspeed`. again the code does not have changing tickspeed in mind in the first place. you will need to huntdown every tickspeed related calculation and adjust the implementation to make them sync 15:50 < bridge> Just say you are 2bad 15:51 < bridge> replacing `#define` with `int` isn't exactly hard... 15:51 < bridge> i don't play CS tbh 15:51 < bridge> okay I know there's more to it than that but you know 15:51 < bridge> sort of is when you consider runtime implications 15:51 < bridge> i dont think it would be complicated necessarily but it’s non trivial 15:51 < bridge> yeah I think it's pretty obvious that making it not break the game isn't super simple 15:51 < bridge> yeah 15:52 < bridge> but it'll compile just fine :) 15:52 < bridge> they obviously didn't consider that and thought it would be a simple change and we are just telling them it isn't that simple i think 15:52 < bridge> **ithink** 15:52 < bridge> yeah you could do it but you need to be on top of that variable’s state 15:52 < bridge> and make sure it’s not copied anywhere i guess 15:52 < bridge> tickrate() W 15:53 < bridge> oh right, and that 15:53 < bridge> There is a pr open for variable tick rate that mostly works, maybe look at that? Idk no one really messed around with this in a decade because no one really made slowmo servers 15:53 < bridge> Ngl I could be funny to make a new tile that slows you down or speeds you up 15:53 < bridge> but it actually is? 15:53 < bridge> either way i would say it is practically impossible if it is a hobby project 15:53 < bridge> If you want to try it locally then you could merge #7555, but it doesn't support lower tickrates than 50 15:53 < bridge> https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/7555 15:53 < bridge> :kek: 15:53 < bridge> A tune zone?? 15:53 < bridge> i still hear rumors from old cs16 players that they cant flick with awp like back in the days on high tps servers 15:53 < bridge> oh you mean multiplies your existing velocity 15:53 < bridge> I'm du 15:53 < bridge> I'm dum 15:54 < bridge> ? useless comment you know exactly why that does not work 15:54 < bridge> xd 15:54 < bridge> be nice 15:54 < bridge> I just realized why it didn’t work, and indeed, due to the fact that the current tick is calculated using multiplication by tick speed, accordingly it lags due to the fact that the tick did not coincide with the last one (or something like that) and it suffered while the tick didn’t become necessary (or again something like that) 15:54 < bridge> grrrr 15:54 < bridge> no 15:54 < bridge> That's curious, with subtick input in cs2 it should be even better than before 15:55 < bridge> i mean it definitely is, i can see that being the case. but i feel like focusing on the tickrate alone and doesn't care about anything else (like hit reg is just a unsolved problem in every game imo) is unproductive 15:55 < bridge> two options: 15:55 < bridge> 1. there's some weird aliasing even with subtick input 15:55 < bridge> 2. people are used to quantized input and are now complaining because proper input feels different 15:55 < bridge> i dont think the input was ever quantized 15:55 < bridge> There is a 3rd option. Both 15:56 < bridge> This does not slow down the game. rex adjusted all the physics to take the tick speed into account 15:56 < bridge> probably yeah 15:56 < bridge> cs2 is just broken :troll: 15:56 < bridge> *but* this would allow for more aggressive tunes 15:56 < bridge> so many clips of ppls bad aim just cuz cs2 makes any shot more random than before 15:57 < bridge> i can see it being better overtime. time traveling in code is just weird, i think they'll figure it out 15:57 < bridge> though changing tunes is obviously incompatible with certain maps 15:57 < bridge> they should™ 15:57 < bridge> cuz in concept subtick is kinda brilliant i would say. 15:57 < bridge> is there any paper to read on that? :P 15:57 < bridge> is there a physics testing framework 15:57 < bridge> @zwelf2 15:58 < bridge> i don't think valve is fancy about papers 15:58 < bridge> rust twgame has many tests afaik 15:58 < bridge> hell yeah 15:58 < bridge> i love rust unit tests 15:58 < bridge> but the idea is pretty simple and you probably already know what it should does i imagine? 15:58 < bridge> Clearly the most reasonable way to get a slomo server is just run the game at a lower tickrate, interpolate it for networking with client, and lie to the client about tunes to kinda smooth it out 15:59 < bridge> 15:59 < bridge> hax 15:59 < bridge> this concept is not popular? 15:59 < bridge> many of the issues attributed to subtick are not actually due to subtick 15:59 < bridge> but due to bad hitboxes etc 15:59 < bridge> not that i know of. none of the netease game has similar system i can tell you that lol 15:59 < bridge> nah its not about hitboxes only, rng is more cruel than before id say 16:00 < bridge> ye, like i said, they just need to sort out the bugs and make it right. there will **always** be points of improvements to make. 16:00 < bridge> Just train rng duh 16:00 < bridge> eh, id just read article about it, that's why im asking 16:00 < bridge> article about subtick? 16:00 < bridge> ye 16:01 < bridge> cs2 was fun when i played it but i only played csgo 5 or so times 16:01 < bridge> i bought it right before they made it f2p 16:01 < bridge> $13 i will never get back 16:01 < bridge> This command was not found. 16:01 < bridge> ddie 16:01 < bridge> i mean it is pretty simple in concept, you just record a event timestamp between input ticks and send them, and server *just* need to calculate everything with that timestamp in mind 16:01 < bridge> prime status worths it ngl 16:01 < bridge> I don't know about CS2 subtick but isn't getting accurate input as simple as timestamping your events? 16:02 < bridge> there are a lot of places that info needed to be consider, and i really mean **a lot** 16:02 < bridge> with no input at all? or interpolate it? 16:02 < bridge> there are a lot of places that info needed to be considered, and i really mean **a lot** 16:02 < bridge> oh lol I guess I was slow 16:02 < bridge> currently valve rely on players framerate being much higher than the tickrate 16:03 < bridge> Well yeah I wouldn't want to retrofit that into an existing game, but I generally kinda include exact timestamps from the start 16:03 < bridge> they haven't got that overwatch range scan i think 16:03 < bridge> wrong assumption. 16:03 < bridge> cs2 does not use subtick for all physics I think, only certain things 16:03 < bridge> gm 16:03 < bridge> hi 16:04 < bridge> i mean player's framerate is higher than the tickrate for most people. so the input is at 300samples/second by default 16:04 < bridge> :pepeW: you can't tell me 300 samples of granularity is worse than sticking to 60 samples 16:04 < bridge> meanwhile *proper* video games polling input on a separate thread so they get millisecond precision 16:05 < bridge> aw yeah rhythm game supremacy 16:05 < bridge> you mean osu 16:05 < bridge> Who does that 16:05 < bridge> of course I mean osu! 16:05 < bridge> afaik only osu does that 16:05 < bridge> When I played osu it was framerate bound polling 16:05 < bridge> i kinda did that in unity too but it breaks too many stuff and i gave that up very quickly lol 16:06 < bridge> #general 16:06 < bridge> they changed it in lazer 16:06 < bridge> the "new" rewrite of the client that has been in the works for like 8 years now does some neat things 16:06 < bridge> nah it was just a joke about cs2 well performance 16:07 < bridge> I know Etterna does this 16:07 < bridge> all rhythm game should do this tbh 16:07 < bridge> but it is kinda hard to implement it right 16:07 < bridge> dreamcast doom; 16:07 < bridge> But atleast client<->server tickrate is negotiable 16:07 < bridge> dreamcast doom! 16:07 < bridge> it's like the motion blur but for timing 16:07 < bridge> or jaguar one 16:07 < bridge> I don't think it is in cs2 only csgo 16:07 < bridge> cs2 is fixed 64tps 16:07 < bridge> yeah in cs:go 16:08 < bridge> i remember carmak used whole motorolla chip to process all inputs 16:08 < bridge> cs:go doesn't exist anymore sadly xd 16:08 < bridge> they probably don't want people messes up their magic numbers set up for the subtick things 16:08 < bridge> i remember carmack used whole motorolla chip to process all inputs 16:08 < bridge> CS 1.6 is the only solution 16:09 < bridge> :greenthing: 16:09 < bridge> They probably avoid supporting it on purpose so they do not get 3rd party servers with higher tick rates 16:09 < bridge> see you guys in #off-topic for rhythm game stuff 16:10 < bridge> i serously doubt valve would be that salty about that 16:10 < bridge> thats why faceit was born 😄 16:10 < bridge> I don't doubt it slightly 16:12 < bridge> The number one complaint of csgo servers was low tick rate so they created an entire new physics and network system just to appease the players who prefer 128tps 16:12 < bridge> what would be the incentive, making players favor official server doesn't even earn them more money 16:12 < bridge> but it keeps the matchmaking up ^^ 16:12 < bridge> Why would they make sub tick if they didn't think there was incentive 16:13 < bridge> that's fair i guess, but i don't think the general player base is affected in the slightest. 16:13 < bridge> "the general player base" cares way less about these. 16:13 < bridge> If you don't allow tick rate changing people cannot complain about your low tick rate 16:14 < bridge> i just think valve is too developer oriented and they are cutting down on unrelated feedbacks. 16:14 < bridge> ~~developer~~money 16:14 < bridge> sounds a bit off ngl 16:14 < bridge> why are you trying to defend multi millionaire company xdd 16:14 < bridge> Imagine Gaben doesnt get his year bonus 16:15 < bridge> i want to be in it okay 16:15 < bridge> also allowing the tick rate to be changed implies their subtick system is insufficient 16:15 < bridge> add variable tickrate to cs2 16:15 < bridge> i do pay u $20 16:16 < bridge> ask chillerdragon, he will do it for you 16:16 < bridge> Or ask evelyn to ask chillerdragon 16:16 < bridge> nah he will make it for free 16:16 < bridge> also he will leak cs2 sources 16:16 < bridge> :justatest: 16:16 < bridge> I quit CS after CS2 was launched 16:16 < bridge> I think ddnet would also have tick rate elitists if more people tried the gameplay in 300tps 16:16 < bridge> also i'm not defending them, but i am justifying their actions. cuz i can see our company makes the exact decision to spend more resources to improve the current system without doubling our on-going cost 16:17 < bridge> f3 tbh 16:17 < bridge> itd help a lot on race 16:17 < bridge> also comptetive mods like vanilla or insta 16:17 < bridge> I'm sure certain things would be easier to hit 16:17 < bridge> certain things would also be harder to hit but oh well 16:17 < bridge> subtick input may keep track of the time that the input was received relative to the rest of the tick & its effect would be different. i do not know how they would accomplish such a thing on one thread (maybe that’s just it) 16:17 < bridge> its the reason why jsaurus made this pr 16:17 < bridge> the game would be 6 times as fast no? 16:17 < bridge> It makes gores movement much easier 16:18 < bridge> *i can also see the exact opposite decision where we would just double our on-going cost to stop developing for the game.* cuz that what they did for our title lol 16:18 < bridge> just divide certain things by 6 to make the physics about the same 16:18 < bridge> they basically did that so they can stop me from improving the movement sync and forced me to move on to cosmetics 16:18 < bridge> and then i just quit 16:18 < bridge> alright 16:19 < bridge> game would be smoother 16:19 < bridge> but the processing power would increase 6 times too 16:19 < bridge> and the packet count sent in a second 16:19 < bridge> not worth it 16:20 < bridge>