00:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] everything is either a duck or not a duck 00:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] is 🦢 duck ? 00:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] no, 🦢 is swan 00:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] I remember having that issue of having to set sv_high_bandwidth overwise server would lag 00:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] maybe an oversight? it's not exactly obvious that applying velocity changes one by one would lead to some people having a weaker hook 😄 12:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] that will cause great physics change 12:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] teeworlds is ship of bugs that allows u to enjoy it 16:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] what command to shut down the server ddnet? 16:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] shutdown 16:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] Thank 16:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] I also wanted to ask, is the “exec” command one hundred percent capable? 16:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] can she run a python file? 16:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] it runs another cfg file, nothing else 16:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] no Python 17:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] is there a function that will replace some parameter in the autoexec_server file for me already on a running server? 17:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] I want to add one parameter in the voting for the map tab that will change sv_test_cmds 17:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] you can use fifo file (if you're on mac or linux) to send command to the server (if i understood what you want correctly) 17:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] can be more 17:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] or documentation 17:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Chairn 17:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] ? 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] @CrazyDevNEW mkfifo /path/to/file.fifo 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] in autoexec.cfg 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] sv_input_fifo "/path/to/file.fifo" 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] echo "broadcast test" > /path/to/file.fifo 17:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] and that no ig, only save_dry that dumps current values ? 17:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] understood nothing 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think he only wants a vote to enable and disable cheats 18:29 <+bridge> [ddnet] But sv_test_cmds cant be changed ingame, you would need to modify code to allow that 20:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] How'd the tests go? 20:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] I really like the new hookline design, much more accurate :heartw: 20:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1011337250514141234/unknown.png 20:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh yeah much better 20:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/1011338412889997342/unknown.png 20:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh sorry, still haven't tested it 20:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] make it thicc 20:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] :gigachad: 20:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] why are the default values this tho 20:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] why should they? 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] from what version did u upgrade? 20:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Not Keks are you worried about me having to rebase against months old code 😄 ? 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Not Keks updated this morning, there was one more update later 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] i am worried u loose fun and the pr lies there as long as learaths pr xdd 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] actually i lost it 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] from what version tho? 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] also was it no the case in the morning? 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] i tried to work this weekend, and i couldn't do it 😦 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] BURNOUT KICKS IN 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] + on linux, i have potato machine so it takes time to compile, and on windows, it takes freaking 40 seconds for linking... 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] probably... 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] not sure what the number was on the first update 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok, bcs this sounds like a really weird bug 😄 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] are the default settings 0 and 100? 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] 0 is the default 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] well I had some values in the middle, assumed those are the default since I updated from a version that didn't have these settings 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] and looking into the code it doesnt look like it could magically change, so this must be some weird bug either in the updater, or smth else 20:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh ok 20:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] funny setting tho, what's the use case? can't imagine why someone would want a phat hookline 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] i think the creator just wanted a bit thicker, bcs he could barely see it 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] i dunno the use case tho, i find it big enough 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] ah maybe on some super high dpi display the 1px line could be hard to see 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] skinny one looks kinda ugly 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] and opacity is very helpful 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] but teeworlds isnt dpi aware 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] 4k will look like full hd 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] but maybe zooming out 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] zooming doesnt change width 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] hookline is always the same size even with zoom 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] then i dont see the use case ^^ 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] if it gets upscaled on high dpi displays then idk xD 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] but lynn also wants bigger UI, i find tw UI insanly big already 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] how about some tooltip when hovering over the button ? 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] when huge ui overhaul update 20:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] when u code ot 20:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] when u code it 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok give me 10 years 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] jk the ui is already amazing 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] only 0.7 one is a bit sexier 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] 0.7 has too many scroll bars 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] and little tiny extensions 23:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] I could try to make tooltips, tho would it make more sense to have that as its own PR and not directly linked to the icon change? 23:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] im trying to sprout ideas for changes in ui setup if you havent seen already