01:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] That is intriguing, it'd be even cuter if it compiled to SQL98 instead of trying to invent a new db engine 01:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] it compiles to psql 01:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] honestly 01:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] sql can do well with a rewrite 01:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] Oh so the underlying db is psql? 01:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye 01:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] the queries are turned into psql queries 01:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] That's actually nice. I might give this a go in some small project sometime 01:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] I've always found writing SQL a little too tedious 01:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah 11:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] PostgreSQL is kind of the new "standard" of SQL. Lots of new database softwares reuse its frontend to have full compatibility 13:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] @louis https://github.com/ddnet/ddnet/pull/5550 what did you mean with triggering checkpoints out of order 14:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] how on earth did you open a PR without github bot noticing it? 14:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] draft i guess 14:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] but ur pr was found 14:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] and yours was draft from start 14:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] while codedev made it draft manually 14:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] maybe the bot or gh just had a timeout, but first time i saw this 😄 14:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] I made it draft in I guess less than 2 sec... so maybe the bot did not poll it in that moment 14:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok but deen also made a draft pr, its just weird 😄 14:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] mh I see 14:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] but also as I created the PR github lagged really hard... I had to reload the page to see my PR as draft. Maybe they had a short downtime 14:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok^^ 15:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] Other topic, does someone know what @louis could have meant with allowing to trigger checkpoints out of order? 15:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] I do not see a real improvement in allowing this. 15:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] Currently you can trigger time Checkpoints out of order, but only in one direction. If you trigger for example CP 10 before you triggered CP 1 to 9, you can no longer trigger CP 1 to 9 but only 11 and further. 15:16 <+bridge> [ddnet] We could also ignore the fact that checkpoints have a ascending order because and just trigger a checkpoint if it was not triggered before in the race 15:16 <+bridge> [ddnet] We could also ignore the fact that checkpoints have a ascending order and just trigger a checkpoint if it was not triggered before in the race 15:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] thats probably the best, yep 15:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] well 15:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] no not really if i think about it 15:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] there are for example solo maps, where you go through a specific part multiple times 16:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] i mesnt that u could do like 10 > 5 > 8 > 12 16:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] in case there are large skips in a map 16:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html 16:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] progress is being made 16:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31967221 16:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] and i cant use it :/ 16:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] tunneled ipv4 sucks hard with teeworlds xD 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think /timecp cmd doesn't work 19:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales 19:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] ipv4 ips go for 50$ now 19:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/993210434805047318/unknown.png 19:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/993210651914801313/unknown.png 19:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] its the new bitcoin 20:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] did they run out? 20:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] is it actually new, that there is a message when loading ddnet client? 20:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes it tells what it's loading now 20:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] YOO 20:18 <+bridge> [ddnet] They ran out long ago, so now corporations/universities that have many for historical reasons start selling theirs. The more expensive they get, the more will be sold. 20:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] dude, that looks so pro. xd i now install plymouth, even though it will show up half a second xd i just like this look. 20:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] i wonder if anyone collects cool ip numbers 20:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] Whats the ipv4 market cap? 20:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] Whats the ipv4 address market cap? 20:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] cloudflare and google have them 20:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] 1.1.1.1 8.8.8.8 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] if u also count ipv6, facebook has 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] 2a03:2880:f10c:83:face:b00c:0:25de 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] which includes "faceb00c" 20:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] Only 215 million I guess 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] Only 215 billion I guess 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] 215 are still buyable or what? 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] wait billion 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] never 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] it only has 4 bytes 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] No I mean the value of all of them if they each sold for 50 dollars 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] bro 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] i think facebook also has a 1337 ipv6 address, i don't know if that's rare 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] the market cap 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] not how much are there 20:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] xD 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] so the market value 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] > Market capitalization, commonly called market cap, is the market value of a publicly traded company's outstanding shares. Market capitalization is equal to the share price multiplied by the number of shares outstanding 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] as if everyone would know that 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] i mean 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] as if everyone would know that 😅 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] u should i guess 20:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] it literally says its the market value 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] so why not use market value xD 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] if u say that people would think about the current market value of the share 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] i think 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] so 50$ 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] human language is just too confusing 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] Why couldn't they just had 3 more 3 digit numbers onto ipv4 and call it a day, they had to get so clever with it 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] ??? 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] ipv6 is better 20:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] and future proof 20:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] real question is, do we ever need 128 bits? 😄 20:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] if not behind a cgnat its even more perfomant 20:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] I was mostly joking 20:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] its never enough 20:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] :greenthing: 20:40 <+bridge> [ddnet] Market cap is not equal to value. For stocks (or IPs, or crypto currencies) if you try to sell a lot, the value will be affected negatively. By having low supply at the moment, you can inflate the price and thus the market cap, but you could never get out as much as you'd expect based on market cap if you sell a lot 20:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marketcapitalization.asp 20:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] this website is a good resource to learn this stuff 20:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] its based on american stuff but works 20:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] what's the term for limit for price of single address? if there is 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] i dont think u buy single addresses 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] u just buy blocks 20:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] and the smaller the block you buy, the more ips you waste 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] because there is gaps of not used addresses? 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] anyway... not know about this. 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] still bad naming xd 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] 20:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] cap is maximum, what justifies this weird shortcut xD 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] its Market Capitalization 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] cap is just short 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] see 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] thats what im saying 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] bad naming 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] cap is maximum thats why i thought there is a limit for highest price for adderss/block 20:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] idk i dont find it that bad 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] then call it MC or smth xD 20:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] better than a naming collision 20:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] doesn't "it's capped" mean it's limited to some price/value? like fps 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes, network address, gateway, and broadcast, so you lose 3 ips per subnet you make 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] well obiously, but not in this case 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] cap != capping. cap = capitalization here 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen do you need a domain name ddrace.network ? 20:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] sounds expensive xD 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] 70$ usd / year for me 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] No, we have https://ddnet.org/ and want to switch to it 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think that looks cleaner 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] I would prefer dd.net 😉 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] thats a lot actually 20:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] i can get it for 30€ / year even on a german seller 20:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes, that's why I suggest, I just pay for it for two years and don't use it in any way)) 20:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] And someone is still redirecting http://ddrace.info/ to us 20:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think we have enough domains, but thanks for asking 20:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] 😄 20:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] greyfox maybe 😄 20:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] ddrace domain collection 20:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] get dd.net 20:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] then u pro 20:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok, i am annoying now, but can't you still use one gateway, broadcast and everything for differenct "fragments". i guess it's not possible. like a virtual block of ip addreses, containing of different blocks not connected, not continuous 20:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] Can you have 2 letter domains? 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] but then you don't have full control over the subnet. if you just get a regular server, they won't give you a subnet for that reason, but just assign you a single ip 20:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] sure, they are just very expensive 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://g.co/ 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] Google says you need special authorization to own one 20:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] doesn't daimler/benz even have d.ai domain or something 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye https://d.ai 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] since 2 letters only have few combinations, its almost impossible anyway 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] Nvm just some of them 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye http://d.ai 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] dd.net would be extremely expensive xd 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] the "old" top level domains especially hard 20:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] they exists since ever basically xd 20:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] How I can compile client for arm(android)? xD 20:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] read the readme in scripts/android 20:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] but i think sdl2 master is broken for android, at least it was last week :D, maybe its fixed again 20:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] gotta manually check out an old version if still broken 20:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] sdl2 main* 21:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] we should get ddnet.university. then we cool 21:01 <+b3z> but we no university 21:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] ofc, i tought few ppl gores 21:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] university of applied teeworlds physics 21:03 <+b3z> then offer a degree 21:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] finish insane first 21:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] xd 21:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] finish multieasy first 😅 21:09 <+b3z> https://ddnet.tw/players/Fin/ 21:09 <+b3z> lol lot changed since i stopped 21:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] with 128bits, you have enough ip for each atom on the surface of earth 🙂 21:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah 21:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] future proof 21:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] but what when we colloniaze mars 21:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] we need 512bits 21:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] that's more atoms than in the universe xd 21:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] that's more than atoms in the universe xd 21:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] 256 would already be enough (slightly lower than lower bound atoms in the universe) 21:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] what bout multiverse, lets go with 4096 bits 21:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] what about multi-multiverse 21:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] lets go with variable length xd 21:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] does anyone know what are these dark red messages? 21:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/993241586068619346/unknown.png 21:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] happening in every servers 21:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] he's ur friend probably 22:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] :justatest: :justatest: :stare: :stare: 22:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] Sorry lmaoo 22:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Axaris :kek: 22:23 <+bridge> [ddnet] them conversations tho