10:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] Let's try to finish up the client and get a RC this week 10:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] Oh actually don't think we can without heinrich being here to take a look at the startline patch 10:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] tomorrow its 5.9.(21)/91 10:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] 10:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] so he probs gets 30 tomorrow xD 11:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] 5991 11:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] pog 11:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] i think it predicts deep hammer wrongly when it's not enabled? i use latest upstream code 11:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/883648866753318912/recording.mp4 11:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] i don't move btw 12:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] oops 13:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye you are right 13:18 <+bridge> [ddnet] if this wasnt before and you have a bit of time, you could do git bisect and open an issue 13:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] it was before 13:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] this is a sv_config, right? so the client may not know about it 13:24 <+bridge> [ddnet] hm? 13:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] I mean, the client most likely doesnt know if hammer in deep is enabled or not on the server 13:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] actually i can't say anything 13:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] but situation is - sometimes you can see this bug, sometimes not 14:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 please merge before^^ 20:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] @HamidReza yo, i deleted the issue (for the editor bug) cause i used your version of ddnet (this one https://github.com/HamidReza585/ddnet). with the official version it works perfectly so if u want to fix it 🙂 21:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] Well I don't think there's anythingto fix, that fork is just created for contributing to main one so maybe it was not just fetched when you downloaded it 21:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] Well I don't think there's anything to fix, that fork is just created for contributing to main one so maybe it was not just fetched when you downloaded it