02:40 <+bridge> [ddnet] is some dev here? 02:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] might need some help with an issue in my game 😄 03:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] hello i am dev 03:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] how can i help 03:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] well 03:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] just yesterday i installed ubuntu on my laptop 03:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] 19.10 03:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] so, when i play ddnet fullscreen it runs normally 03:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] when i minimize it, it happens some weird video issues 03:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] graphic issues 03:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] dont minimize 03:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] ez fix 05:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] Smart af 06:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Pepe f1 -> gfx_resizable 0 06:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] maybe it should default to 0, until someone fixes the SDL code, which is a mess 07:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 that would be weird, I build it with --with-darwinssl 08:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen well there was that one guy in #general and I also downloaded and checked it. Does the static library maybe use the builtin libcrypto dynamically? 08:15 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think you are no longer allowed to link with libcrypto on macOS, maybe there is a way to build libcurl with the modern apple crypto apis or maybe we can build and bundle openssl 10:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen why are we linking statically anyway? I think we should include a framework like we do with sdl 11:03 <@deen> because I build that myself and for sdl i just take the prepared one 11:03 <@deen> no idea how build curl into a framework for mac os 11:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen well there is a ./ 11:18 <+bridge> [ddnet] ./MacOSX-Framework script shipped along with curl 11:18 <+bridge> [ddnet] it doesn't work anymore in catalina but maybe it still works on whatever old version of macOS you build on 11:18 <@deen> I cross-compile 11:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh, hmm when you have time can you check if secure transport gets enabled correctly while building? 11:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] that script looks pretty simple too, it should be easy enough to modify to work with osxcross 12:05 <@deen> should I use --with-secure-transport instead of --with-darwinssl? 12:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] --with-darwinssl enables secure transport 12:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen what SDK are you building with btw? 12:07 <@deen> SSL: no (--with-{ssl,gnutls,nss,mbedtls,wolfssl,schannel,secure-transport,mesalink,amissl} ) 12:08 <@deen> osxcross 12:08 <@deen> so apparently darwinssl is not enough (anymore?) 12:08 <@deen> will try with secure-transport instead 12:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah but for using osxcross you first get a sdk 12:08 <@deen> good question, don't remember 12:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] which version of libcurl is this? on 7.69.1 it seems it's still --with-darwinssl 12:09 <@deen> 7.67.0 12:09 <@deen> i checked with --help 12:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] I guess it is --with-secure-transport on that version 12:10 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 do u have experience with vulkan 12:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] not much, I did render a triangle 12:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] im swimming in verbosity and i get a segfault no idea why xDD 12:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] vulkan is VERY low level 12:12 <@deen> hm, apparently secure-transport also doesn't work. let me try 7.69.1 12:14 <+bridge> [ddnet] Your SDK might be too old too, I think secure transport got a major overhaul at 10.8 12:17 <@deen> ah 12:17 <@deen> any tip for which one to get? 12:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] Well i'm not completely sure with regards to compatibility, but I think you can compile with any sdk >= and set the deployment target to 13:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] Turns out curl's configure checks for /System/Library/Frameworks/Security.framework which obviously doesn't exist when I'm cross-compilint 13:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] @deen how did you fix it? 13:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] changed the path manually in the configure file for now 13:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] not sure how this can be fixed properly, maybe just get rid of the check? 13:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] I'll try to do a patch to curl later 13:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] huh, does the SDK include Security.framework? 13:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes 13:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] interesting, wouldn't know how to fix it either though, it'd be a little bit of a hack to check whether the CFLAGS line has a -isysroot 13:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] Like this I guess: https://github.com/curl/curl/pull/5189 14:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] just a sec, need to install my own SDL framework to test 14:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] it takes excessive fiddling just to get things to link against my copy of SDL2 14:10 <+bridge> [ddnet] but the curl change does work 14:10 <+bridge> [ddnet] atleast when I compile on macOS, I'm not sure if the version you compile will work 14:17 <+bridge> [ddnet] thanks for checking 17:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] bois i still cant read c++ errors is there some sort of tool that is more noob friendly when it comes to linker errors? 17:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/696741495306190938/unknown.png 17:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] i mean is it even possible to read the error out of this without looking at the code? 17:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon it usually means you forgot to define a method of `IClient` that you declared in `CClient` 17:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] hello misters nerds and hackers! Is there any way I can know how many of DDNet servers users play with vanilla client? 17:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] version number maybe 17:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] check for clientid=0 17:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] Ooookay! Can I have log pas to DDNet database now ? 17:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] lmao 17:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] sry for sarcastics, but how it could help me? 17:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] then the answer is no 17:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] logs cant be public 17:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] true! But what about some "funny" statistics or something (you call it) 17:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] I just wonder why devs care about vanilla support so much 17:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] new players had vanilla client ofc 17:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] if you have some statistics script that you want to run on the actual servers, you can give it to me to run it on the actual logs 17:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] first you find vanilla then ddnet 17:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] thank you, @heinrich5991 , I will return when I have some 17:48 <+bridge> [ddnet] i looked at the stats on my server last year and totaled everyones last-used version number https://pastebin.com/2DC5zJni @BannZay 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] outdated but similar to what ur asking about 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] why cant vanilla client just be ddnet 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] bloat 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] devs care about vanilla support because alot of people are still using vanilla 17:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] isnt ddnet just vanilla but better 17:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] are there features exclusive to vanilla 17:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] there arent but some people prefer vanilla client 17:50 <+bridge> [ddnet] why do u need ddnet features in vanilla client 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] why not 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] bloat 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] if ppl want to see other servers they dont see weird -999 times 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] antiping/64player support 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] and skins and quality of life changes 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] skins might be a reason to not use ddnet client 17:51 <+bridge> [ddnet] just enable vanilla skins only tho lol, it's what i do 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] u can add or remove whatever skins u want from the game files but some people dont know or dont want to bother 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/696749238385639554/unknown.png 17:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] 1 click fix 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] no 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] u need to find it first 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] so like 5min effort 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] if ur new 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] most common reason to not use ddnet client is because its laggier i think 17:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby did you try continuing the bisect? ^^ 17:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] no i deleted the folder is there an easy way to resume closer to where i left off 17:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] well you can start from two commits that are closer together 17:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] you just need a bad commit and a good commit, closer the better 17:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] you could test whether 0a9f291 is bad 17:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] if it is, then we have a bad commit 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] how to test 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] build it 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] see if if makes your fans spin 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] `git checkout 0a9f291`, test it 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] clone the repo then git checkout? ok 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] you don't need to re-clone it if you already have it somewhere 17:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] `git worktree add /tmp/bisect` 17:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] (I only have one git repository for teeworlds and ddnet) 18:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] i dont have the newest version ill redo it 18:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] (let's note down commit IDs before deleting this time) 18:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] I have 1 for ddnet 1 for teeworlds, the branches just diverged so much 18:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] I have two worktrees for that 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] still the same repository 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://discordapp.com/channels/252358080522747904/293493549758939136/696745007453044737 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] but is there a tool that tells me which method? 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] makes cherry-picking easier 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] huh, never used worktrees 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] it's basically another checkout with the same repository 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] very useful if you're in the middle of writing a feature and need to test some PR 18:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon the method you just added/renamed/changed in some way 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] yea so looking at the code 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] but i have build errors since hours and there is some code i touched 😄 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon C++ errors are notoriously shit, there is no tool that makes them better 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] im talking in general 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] sad 18:03 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 build one pls thx 18:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] the information is lost, the compiler is the one that's supposed to handle this 18:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] i downloaded it ill build now 18:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] ye 18:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby 👍 18:04 <+bridge> [ddnet] but if you ask the compiler people it's the standards committees jo, and if you ask the standards committee it's the users job not to be a moron 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] meh i suck at this job 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon a clean rebuild is usually helpful as it might be giving a warning you are ignoring 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] did it 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] also compile with -Wall -Werror 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] ah 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] is that default in tw ? 18:05 <+bridge> [ddnet] maybe even -Weverything if you have clang 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 I thought -Wall -Werror was default but I never get compile errors, how2enable? 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] `-Weverything` is useless 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] it activates warnings that are not helpful 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon that error is pretty sane for c++ 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] :justatest: 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] .. 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] `-Wall -Wextra -Werror` is active for ddnet, I think @Learath2 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] eh no 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] still not very helpful 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] `-Wall -Wextra` 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] well u need to google vtable 18:06 <+bridge> [ddnet] `-Werror` on CI 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] -Weverything I suggested because it enables some weird static analysis, might catch what chiller is missing 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] im sure vtable is some sort of virtual function table 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] why cant it drop a func name 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon are u using clang or gcc 18:07 <+bridge> [ddnet] i think clang is known for clearer errors 18:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] idk 18:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] cc --version 18:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] :saddo: 18:08 <+bridge> [ddnet] cc (Debian 8.3.0-6) 8.3.0 18:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] gcc 18:09 <+bridge> [ddnet] well the easiest things to check is the virtual constructor and destructor, if they are virtual that is 18:10 <+bridge> [ddnet] well the issue was a missing = 0; on a virtual 18:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] on a pure virtual 18:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] i gues 18:11 <+bridge> [ddnet] yea sad c++ seems to be evil 18:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] the more bash i write the more annoyed i am by c++ 😄 18:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] I love it when my strings get accidentally split by spaces when I forget to quote them 18:12 <+bridge> [ddnet] i love how u only have one argument :p 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] shellcheck is ur friend ull never forget to quote 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] in python, the compiler does that for me 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] hotkey in vim to lint using shellcheck is bae 18:13 <+bridge> [ddnet] no more accidental errors 18:15 <+bridge> [ddnet] fans still spin, am going to test again with working version rl quick to make sure its nothing else i have running 18:19 <+bridge> [ddnet] and fans spun down once i started playing with old client 18:20 <+bridge> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 can i continue bisecting from that commit? 18:21 <+bridge> [ddnet] cppcheck is a decent static analyzer 18:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby yes, you mark that one bad, then you checkout the good one and mark that one good 18:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] how 18:22 <+bridge> [ddnet] im nub at git 18:25 <+bridge> [ddnet] installed cppcheck thanks will look further into it when ill get stuck on something again @Learath2 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby what do you want to do exactly? 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] continue bisecting versions of ddnet between the commit heinrich just sent ^ and the working version 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] ah 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] git checkout 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] i guess? 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] which 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] tho 18:26 <+bridge> [ddnet] git log 18:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] then search for the current hash 18:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] last time it was like git bisect start and i just typed 10.6.2 18:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] and scroll up 18:27 <+bridge> [ddnet] idr 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://paste.zillyhuhn.com/eo 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby those are the hashes following 10.6.2 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] git checkout fe05f0dfbc92bf440e80504777b02a6f49132e0d 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] to step one further 18:28 <+bridge> [ddnet] commit ec5ede7633ed9bde1d1673f5dbb92f654030a0e8 (tag: 10.6.2) 18:29 <+bridge> [ddnet] Version 10.6.2 18:29 <+bridge> [ddnet] i guess thats the one i need 18:29 <+bridge> [ddnet] do i have to git bisect start 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] which commit works for you? 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] or which version? 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] git bisect start 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] 10.6.2 works 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] git bisect good 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] and master doesnt? 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] git bisect bad 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] it works but fans spin 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok ty and i can put the hash of the commit in its place? 18:30 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] or the release tag works as well 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] git bisect bad 0a9f291 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] Bisecting: 102 revisions left to test after this (roughly 7 steps) 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] [fed747b9a0baf92f627cfaa42245ef99ce86e441] curl-4.lib needs to reference libcurl-4.dll 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] ok 18:31 <+bridge> [ddnet] eh 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] did you check that 0a9f291 is bad? 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] [11:15 AM] onby: fans still spin, am going to test again with working version rl quick to make sure its nothing else i have running 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] [11:19 AM] onby: and fans spun down once i started playing with old client 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] good 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] then continue testing 18:32 <+bridge> [ddnet] do u think it could have something to do with the way its compiled 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] I can't rule that out 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] [ 77%] Linking CXX executable DDNet 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] ld: library not found for -lGL 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh this error 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] lol 18:33 <+bridge> [ddnet] this mightve been around where we stopped last time 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] replace `set(PLATFORM_CLIENT_LIBS GL GLU X11)` by 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] ``` 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] find_library(CARBON Carbon) 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] find_library(COCOA Cocoa) 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] find_library(OPENGL OpenGL) 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] find_library(SECURITY Security) 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] set(PLATFORM_CLIENT_LIBS ${COCOA} ${OPENGL} ${CARBON} ${SECURITY}) 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] ``` 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] in `CMakeLists.txt` 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] [ 37%] Linking CXX executable DDNet 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] "CNotification::notify(char const*, char const*)", referenced from: 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] CChat::AddLine(int, int, char const*) in chat.cpp.o 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_main", referenced from: 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] implicit entry/start for main executable 18:34 <+bridge> [ddnet] (maybe you meant: _SDL_main) 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 you here btw? 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] replacing main seems straightforward (?) but idk about the other one 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] delete `notify` in the `CCHat::AddLine` function 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] ```#if defined(CONF_PLATFORM_MACOSX) || defined(__ANDROID__) 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] extern "C" int SDL_main(int argc, char **argv_) // ignore_convention 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] { 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] const char **argv = const_cast(argv_); 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] #else 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] int main(int argc, const char **argv) // ignore_convention 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] { 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] #endif``` 18:35 <+bridge> [ddnet] wait wut 18:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] in client.cpp 18:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] isnt this what it should be 18:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] maybe remove `CONF_PLATFORM_MACOSX` there 18:36 <+bridge> [ddnet] → `#if 0` 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_CFStringCreateWithCString", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_CreateStandardAlert", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_GetCurrentProcess", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_RunStandardAlert", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_SetFrontProcess", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] "_TransformProcessType", referenced from: 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] _gui_messagebox in system.c.o 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] 98% finished 18:37 <+bridge> [ddnet] should i just comment this stuff out lol 18:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes 18:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] the stuff in `gui_messagebox` 18:38 <+bridge> [ddnet] it compiled 18:39 <+bridge> [ddnet] woohoo 18:41 <+bridge> [ddnet] @heinrich5991 kinda here, waiting on bread in the oven 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] fanspin 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby does it even spin thou 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] gh 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] git bisect bad 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] onto the next 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] and i thought it mightve been because i have two copies of ddnet open but 18:42 <+bridge> [ddnet] then i quit and opened the working one and the fps is 350 not 200 and the spining starts to decrease 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] oke 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] Bisecting: 51 revisions left to test after this (roughly 6 steps) 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by checkout: 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] src/base/system.c 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] src/engine/client/client.cpp 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] Please commit your changes or stash them before you switch branches. 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] Aborting 18:43 <+bridge> [ddnet] wat do 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] why do you have local changes? 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] git stash them and keep going 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] local changes to get it to compile^ 18:44 <+bridge> [ddnet] we have local changes because it doesn't compile without them 18:45 <+bridge> [ddnet] does stash mean i will not have to do the changes again 18:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] stash means you can get them back 18:46 <+bridge> [ddnet] yes 18:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] `git stash` saves some changes `git stash pop` applies them again 18:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] (`git stash` is a stack) 18:47 <+bridge> [ddnet] ooo ok cool 18:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] Git stash never worked for me... 18:49 <+bridge> [ddnet] I always lose my changes and get pissed 18:52 <+bridge> [ddnet] Btw dont remove or modify client.m 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] git stash is best 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] The way it starts the client could indeed be the issue as it actually messes with the stack 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] hm? old versions didn't have it I think @Learath2 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] rly?lol now im curious what its doing 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] and git stash worked 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] I think @onby's version doesn't have it 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] that's fine, it it doesn't have it then don't add it and if it does have it don't remove it to get it compiling 18:53 <+bridge> [ddnet] ah 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] #ifdef SDL_USE_CPS 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] { 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] CPSProcessSerNum PSN; 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] /* Tell the dock about us */ 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] if (!CPSGetCurrentProcess(&PSN)) 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] if (!CPSEnableForegroundOperation(&PSN,0x03,0x3C,0x2C,0x1103)) 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] what is this hacks 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] the old client.m starts the client from a NSApplication event 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] wtf 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] NSA 👀 18:54 <+bridge> [ddnet] thus actually blocking in the callback which might be affecting performance 18:55 <+bridge> [ddnet] the new and improved client.m no longer does all that insane stuff 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] oh wow after a couple more bisects this version finally has the old style of text font 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] and it seems to be better 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] just play version 902 :p 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] dont use mac 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] i dont like sdl1 18:56 <+bridge> [ddnet] install arch and install the ddnet package 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] u 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] install hackintosh lmao 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] macOS is so sooooo soooooooo painful 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] om 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] what should i do if this version seems to be the halfway point between working and not 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] the fps is noticeably better than last bisect 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] imagine not allowing people to use your ssl library thus not allowing people to use TLS1.3 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] fans spin only a little bit 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] @Learath2 admit it u slowly become big 🍎 boi 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby did u make sure settings are the same 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] its same settings_ddnet.cfg i have cl_save_settings 0 always 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] and what does it mean fans spinning? are u not limiting the cpu ? 18:57 <+bridge> [ddnet] i limit ddnet to 1000hz 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] it means the fans spin 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] you are only allowed to use the ssl library through apples shitty Secure Transport API which doesn't support anything new 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] and if the same settings cause no spinning on ddnet 10.6.2 and spinning on 10.6.7 then there is a problem no? 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/696765784512266370/unknown.png 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] opengl best 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] yeah the opengl3 renderer is great for performance 18:58 <+bridge> [ddnet] onbgygl3 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] we should allow opengl 4.5 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] on those who can 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] I still can't believe the bugs we have in it... Imagine failing to render 2d graphics in 2020 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] it's shameful 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] we don't need any opengl 4.5 features 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] glxinfo | grep "OpenGL version" 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] OpenGL version string: 4.6 (Compatibility Profile) Mesa 20.0.4 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] 4.6 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] [11:57 AM] onby: what should i do if this version seems to be the halfway point between working and not 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] [11:57 AM] onby: the fps is noticeably better than last bisect 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] but fps seems less than 10.6.2 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] lets use all the shiny new things 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] $ glxinfo | grep "OpenGL version" 18:59 <+bridge> [ddnet] OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 18.3.6 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] does that point to there being two things that cause reduced fps 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] should i just mark it as good for now 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] @ChillerDragon lol 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] arcane laptop 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] @onby take a note of the version 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] actually the exact SHA 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] then mark it bad if you want to bisect further 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] thanks 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/293493549758939136/696766344686993428/unknown.png 19:00 <+bridge> [ddnet] it almost feels like there are two things reducing fps 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] but its closer towards working than not 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] the mac kernel 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] Bisecting: 24 revisions left to test after this (roughly 5 steps) 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] [e0bf9a6d7cadf8950b163d20fcce3ecb9e662192] Merge pull request #786 from timakro/pr_check_teleport_hold_hook 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] :poggers: 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] isnt mac kernel freebsd or sumsin? 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] if i mark it as good can i come back to it later and mark it as bad to find the "other" thing 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] it's darwin 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] bsd* 19:01 <+bridge> [ddnet] branched from bsd waaay back 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] lol 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] so bsd->darwin->macos? 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] why would apple branch from something that has "free" in it 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] its communism 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] cuz they can make it non free 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] well it's Mach kernel 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] bsd license 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] Darwin is the OS structure i think 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] macho vs elf huh? 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet] macho man 19:02 <+bridge> [ddnet]